It shows that the country’s complete autonomy will weaken the country, and the BJP stage set out in the TN parliament

BJP legislator Nainar Nagenthran said at the general meeting on Tuesday that the need for a complete autonomy of the country will weaken the country and therefore has no reason, incorrect and unacceptable.

He led his party’s Justice Association (MLAS) on a walk, opposing Chief Minister MK Stalin’s announcement of the establishment of the High Commission for Research Centre – State Relations. AIADMK, BJP’s allies are not in the house because it has come out of another problem.

Nagenthran said in his speech that the need for a complete autonomy of the state would weaken the country, but would instead solve the problem in platforms such as the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Commission. Palanivel Minister Thiaga Rajan clarified the percentage of decentralization mentioned by BJP lawmakers. The minister also noted that sewage and surcharges remain outside the divisible pool.

It was noted that the GST Commission had one third of the votes, and all states collectively received two-thirds of the votes, the same right to vote among them, and they had an equal share of the vote regardless of their population, Mr Rajan believed that the GST Council could not take the classic example of federalism as an example.

Mr Nagenslan’s argument is the idea that the Congressional government is a Congressional government, and Congress leader K. selvaperunthagai argues that although his party is for the launch of the GST, it is not in its current form, the GST is also solicited here for the intensive care units and for people with disabilities. Mr Selvaperunthagai rejected Mr Nagenthran’s arguments launched during the Congressional administration, saying it was caused in a case filed by the Sankalp Charitable Trust due to the Supreme Court’s decision.

As for Mr. Nagenslan’s arguments on the comments on the late “Baba Sahib” BR Ambedkar on national autonomy, VCK MLA SS Balaji proposed an order and clarified that the late leaders supported national autonomy. “Mr. Nagann said it seemed as if the late leader Ambedkar did not support national autonomy. [then provincial] Autonomy,” Mr. Balaji pointed out.

Another argument by Mr. Nagenstrand is that the late Ambedka did not support the division of language in the country, and DMK MLA N. Ezhilan proposed the order. Mr Ezhilan said that although Ambedkar’s late Ambedkar initially opposed the division of states along the language community, he eventually changed his position after reading the report of the National Reorganization Commission.

Thanks to those who made the speech after the announcement of the news, Chief Minister MK Stalin accepted the request of Mr Selvaperunthagai that the speech of former Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi on the 1974 National Autonomy was reprinted and distributed to the members. “My only regret is that AIADMK (which is the main opposition) has not been involved in the litigation and has made an opinion. Neither it is AIADMK founder Makkal Thilagam [former CM] mgr or [former CM] Ammaiyar Jayalalithaa, despite being different from the DMK, is still expanding their support to protect Tamil Nadu’s rights. ”

“But we don’t know what the situation is now. We can understand. But they would say their principles are different from their alliance. Is this your principle? This is the question to be asked.” In view of Tamil Nadu’s rights, Mr Stalin put forward the demand before AIADMK: “Let us all unite and protect Tamil Nadu’s rights by moving beyond political affiliation and working as a team. I hope they can do that.”

In his speech, House leader and minister Duraimurugan argued that despite the former coalition government demanding approval of funds for state autonomy and other positions on the state, coalition governments increasingly develop “imperialist” mindsets and that if the state has other perspectives, funds are not approved. He said that even after 50 years, the DMK, which began to advocate for national autonomy, continued to do so.

EOM