Benny Johnson: Will the 9/11 attack be investigated again? Republican Senator Ron Johnson hints
9/11 Attack: Republican senator says eyes are “open”
“I’m honestly asking a lot of questions,” according to the Hill, a congressman told Podcast host Benny Johnson on Monday, who said. The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigation is one of the most powerful congressional groups. Its jurisdiction allows it to investigate a wide range of matters. Throughout the course of survival, the committee investigated serious matters, such as the market crash in 2008.
Also read: Earth Day 2025: Is Earth Day today? Date, theme, history, event, celebration
Ron Johnson reiterates the 9/11 conspiracy theory
Ron seemed to strongly endorse the debunking theory about one of the buildings near the Twin Towers in an interview with prominent conservative commentator Benny. The infamous theory spread the collapse of the World Trade Center complex building 7 was actually a “controlled demolition.”
The 47-story structure collapsed for several hours after a commercial plane hijacked by al-Qaeda terrorists was sent into the Twin Towers. An investigation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) found that the collapse of Building 7 was because firefighters were unable to curb firefighters in time due to problems related to on-site water pressure.
Ron Johnson questions ‘corruption’ NIST investigation
However, Ron strongly proposed the integrity of the investigation, even reaching the mark of “corruption”. The collapse of the seventh floor has long been one of the favorite conversation points for conspiracy theorists.
FAQ
Q1. Who is responsible for the investigation of the permanent subcommittee of the Senate?
A1. The congressional panel is currently led by Republican Senator Ron Johnson.Q2. What is the official version of the World Trade Center Building 7 crash?
A2. Based on NIST’s investigation, the official version said that due to the prolonged fire, issues related to the water pressure at the 9/11 attack could not be included in time.
Disclaimer: This content is written by a third party. The views expressed here are the views of the respective authors/entities and do not represent the views of the Economic Times (ET). ET does not warrant, warrant, or endorse any of its contents, nor is it responsible for them in any way. Please take all necessary steps to make sure that any information and content provided is correct, updated and verified. ET hereby disclaims any warranties, express or implied, relating to the Report and any Content.
