By A. MC
Politicians face enviable choices when dealing with the UK’s tax-based National Health Services Department. If they fund this but fail to reform, they find themselves facing allegations of sprinting health care inflation and spending they raise without corresponding results. If they make reforms, they will be accused of “intervention” (which usually reflects the dissatisfaction of nurses and doctors trying to squeeze efficiency out of the mottled system). David Cameron tried the toughest combination, which was to perform efficiency on the four-year form from 2001-2015 to save £20bn of tightening efficiency to ensure the same coverage for the aging population. Few people believe this works.
