Holywood News

India rejects Trump’s mediation claims

New Delhi: As U.S. President Donald Trump showed, India rejected the prospect of any U.S. mediation in Kashmir on Tuesday, noting that India has been representing bilateral engagement on the issue of Pakistan, and the only issue related to Kashmir is the Pakistani holiday in Occupied Pakistan.

MEA spokesman Randhir Jaiswal also contradicted Trump’s assertion in his weekly briefing that the United States threatens trade relations with India and Pakistan if the United States does not block hostilities. “After the start of May 7, operation Sindor began, there was no trade problem in any discussion between the United States and India,” he said.

A MEA spokesman also made it clear that India will continue to maintain the Indian Water Treaty (IWT) “temporarily suspended until Pakistan is reliable and irrevocably conceals its support for cross-border terrorism.” “There is a new normal now () the sooner you get used to it, the better,” he said.

Jaiswal said India will go to the UN-sanctioned 1267 Sanctions Committee (Pakistan-backed terrorist group) The Rissance Front, the terrorist group Lashkar-e-Tayyaba (LET), claiming two responsibilities to Pahalgam Massacre. Questions about Indian civilian casualties during Indian civilian casualties have elicited no response, but government authorities earlier stated that Pakistan died in shelling by 16 Indian civilians.

A MEA spokesman said: “The power of Indian weapons forced Pakistan to stop firing”, noting “an extremely effective attack on Pakistan’s major air force bases”. After that, the Pakistan High Commission convened the MEA at 12.37 pm on May 10, following the initial difficulties of Pakistan connecting the hotline to India for technical reasons.

“The specific date, time and wording of understanding was reached between the DGMOs of the two countries, thus clearly showing that the understanding was reached directly between the two neighbors. “The states that Pakistan (Pakistan) cultivate terrorism on an industrial scale should think that it can escape the consequences of being deceived by itself,” he said.

He also pointed to available satellite images showing damage to the terrorist hiding places and Pakistani air force bases. He described Pakistan asserting victory as an “old habit” because he said India’s military operations were entirely in traditional territory.

“From the understanding of the OP Sindoor’s cessation of dismissal and military operations until May 10, there was a dialogue between India and the U.S. leaders on the evolving military situation. In these discussions, trade issues did not appear.”

“We have a long-standing national position that any issues related to Indian trade union territory on both India and Pakistan must be resolved. The policy of this provision has not changed. As you know, the outstanding thing is the holiday of Pakistan’s illegal occupation of Indian territory.”

A spokesperson for the MEA said: “On May 10, 2025, the two countries’ dgmos conducted a specific date, time and wording between the two countries’ DGMOs, of course, our reasoning is that according to the 1535 hours of Indian DGMO, we will carry out an extremely effective attack on Pakistan Air Force Base in 10 days. India’s devastating reaction.

He added: “In terms of dialogue with other countries, India’s message is clear and consistent. The message we convey from the public platform is the message conveyed in private dialogue. This is India’s terrorist attacks on terrorist attacks on April 22 in response to the terrorist infrastructure, but the delivery of the Indian army will also stop with the Indian armed forces. At the beginning of the sindoor, it came naturally that Pakistan’s side was not cared for by the Pakistani side.

Jaiswal said in the Indus Treaty: “The IWT ends with a spirit of goodwill and friendship, as in the preamble of the treaty. However, Pakistan has held these principles for decades by promoting the promotion of cross-border terrorism. Terrorism also note that climate change, demographic shifts and technological changes have created new realities locally.”

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button