Donald Trump ignores the law: Why does Trump feel that he can ignore the law without consequences? Diving deep

Donald Trump’s disregard for the rule of law is clear. Considering that all three judges of his appointment to the Supreme Court joined a mid-night emergency sentence that prevented the illegal deportation of more Venezuelan nationals to El Salvador – no one should be deported if the court has ruled 9-0 to rule that no one has no hearing in the first place.

However, you cannot cure the disease without a diagnosis. To fight back with Trump, the country and the courts need to understand why he launched a legal war, not just him.

Although it might be thought of this, the best diagnosis is not that Trump is just crazy or wants to be a dictator. His behavior can be rationally explained by his incentives and past behaviors.
In short, Trump has learned over the past eight years — two failed impeachment, three crimes and a Toothless New York conviction — his personal cost is essentially zero when he violates the law. Like any child who has no consequences for his actions, he concluded that the rules do not apply to him. He will continue to break the law until he pays the price for it.

Although performances illegally interfere with his preferred policy, Trump repeatedly shows that he cares about what is happening, not the message his actions convey. The illegal action frightened his opponent, who then contributed to extensive news coverage, telling his supporters that he was accepting elites they didn’t like.

Please read also: “Already seen Donald Duck”: The President of Colombia brutally mocked Trump, saying that we have revoked his sensitive president, that the president does not want to comply with the law, that there should be internal agency inspections that make him do so. One is the Office of the Legal Counsel of the Ministry of Justice. For decades, OLC has been an independent law firm within the administration. Before the president does anything that may push the legal envelope, he should obtain a formal memorandum from the OLC to analyze the legal issues and conclude that it is impossible to take or cannot act, and how in normal administration, OLC memorandums are often regarded as having the power of the law itself. The system is imperfect: George W. Bush, an attorney in the office.

But the OLC system may also be self-corrected. When he took over OLC, Jack Goldsmith (now my colleague at Harvard Law School) immediately noticed the legal errors in the memorandum and withdrew them. It was an act of personal courage that ended Goldsmith’s rapid and well-deserved rise in the conservative legal community. At the same time, this is an act of institutional recovery. The denial of early memorandums consolidated the OLC’s reputation as truly independent and was a brake on illegal execution of actions.

Please read also: Pete Hegseth

As Goldsmith himself pointed out, Trump ignored the OLC. There is no consultation form of OLC, and the execution of the order came out of the White House, which is obviously illegal. Once lost, OLC inspections will be very difficult in future governments. It takes time to build a reliable OLC team and not just subordinate legal theories to a given president. And having top lawyers hire staff on the team to ask them to believe what they can say is important.

Then there is the Attorney General, the top law enforcement official in the United States. The person can also insist that the CEO’s actions are legal and can be used as a president’s inspection. Pam Bondi seems to have no interest in playing the role, and even if they are obviously illegal, they prefer to post support for presidential policies on social media. By contrast, William Barr, who served as attorney general in Trump’s first administration, looked like a model of legal constraints, despite his great efforts to promote Trump’s interests, including undermining Robert Mueller’s investigation. Barr is a master of deploying subtle readings of legal rules to maximize presidential power. But at least he is unwilling to provide verbal services to the rule of law. Bondy didn’t even do that.

Also Read: Pete Hegseth does “huge work”: Despite a lot of controversy, why doesn’t Trump fire the U.S. Secretary of Defense?

As a result, Trump is acting rationally, causing his actions to cancel the agency bar. Not only did he lose anything because of legal action, he also gained benefits from the situation where the court stopped him.

So the solution is to find ways to make Trump pay a meaningful price for violating the law. This is unlikely to come from the Supreme Court, which has created criminal sanctions from the dining table, or from Congress, which does not seem to be a realistic possibility. It must come directly from the people, expressing itself through elections, protests and poll numbers. In our democracy, the people have given us Donald Trump. Now the same person must protect himself from attacks on the law. If we don’t do this, our democracy will not survive.