Razvi Bareilvi criticized Vijay for allegedly negative portraying Muslims in his films and invited people involved in gambling and drinking to his iftar party.
“He (Vijay) has formed a party and has a gracious relationship with Muslims. However, he portrays Muslims in a negative way because of those who spread terrorism in his films. Gamblers and spirit consumers are invited to join his iftar party. Because of all this, Temni Muslim of Him Mouss of Temni is angry with him. Shouldn’t stand with Vijay,” said Maulana Razvi Bareilvi.
Recently, TVK Chief Vijay filed a petition in the Supreme Court challenging the WAQF (Amendment) 2025.
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard a batch of petitions questioning the effectiveness of the WAQF (Amendment) Act, the constitutional validity of 2025.
The Supreme Court said it could pass an interim order to retain some key provisions of the recently passed WAQF (Amendment) Act in 2025 and expressed concern about violence in the Murhidabad region of West Bengal.
“One of the very disturbing things is the violence that happened. The issue is in court, and we will decide.”
The judge did not pass any order, but suggested that certain provisions may be retained, including the inclusion of non-Muslims on the Central WAQF Committee and the WAQF Board, the power of the collector, which determines the disputes in the WAQF property and the provisions regarding the pronounced property of the court declared as WAQF.
At the hearing, the bench said it was considering passing an interim order that would balance the stock.
“We would say-no property announced by the court will be declared or treated as non-WAQF, whether the user is a WAQF or not. Secondly, the collector can proceed with the proceedings but will not follow the example in the lawsuit, but third, third on WAQF Boards and Council, waqf boards and Council … exciteio officio officio officio officio officio ofide of Saide ove bude bude bude bude bude busen bude wasd and other members have been appointed.
Cji Khanna is about to decide the order, but Deputy Attorney General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre and other lawyers who are defending the bill, said their voices should be heard before the interim order was passed.
The bench then released the matter, with further hearings to be held at 2 p.m. Thursday.
