By the way, the verdict was passed by Justice Sanjay Kumar Singh on March 11, and hardly another bench passed a controversial order (March 17) that held that just grabbing the breast and pulling the rope of the “pajamas” does not constitute rape. The March 17 judgment was made by Justice Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra of Allahabad HC, which was left by the Supreme Court on March 26, saying it lacked “part of the sensitivity of the author of the judgment.”
Justice Singh ruled in a March 11 ruling that defendant Nischal Chandak “proposes a case suitable for bail”. The judgment read: “The court held that even if the victim’s allegations were accepted as true, it was possible to conclude that she herself invited trouble and was responsible for the same responsibility. The victim took a similar position in her statement.
The victim registered the FIR on September 23 for the incident that occurred on September 21, 2024. According to the defense attorney’s argument, the victim was an adult and she resided in the PG Hotel. Defense attorneys claimed that the victim “voluntarily with her girlfriend, who went to the “record room bar restaurant” with their male friend, where they drank together, so she became very intoxicated.
The defense attorney further argued: “Since she (the victim) needed support, she herself agreed to go to the applicant’s House (the defendant) to rest. The victim’s allegation was that the applicant, rather than his house, brought her to his relative’s apartment and raped her twice was false, against the evidence.” The defense attorney argued that “this is not a rape case, but a case concerning a consistent relationship between the parties.” Some believe that the defendant has been in trouble in prison since December 11, 2024 and has no criminal history to be praised.
The State objected to the bail request “but could not object to the above facts as argued by the representative applicant.” The order reads.
