Holywood News

Papua New Guinea Facebook Ban: Small Pacific countries sparked up uproar by banning Facebook; This is why the government stands in amid major backlash

Papua New Guinea (PNG) temporarily blocked access to Facebook, known as a surprise move, to curb hate speech, misinformation and clear content. The closure of enforcement under anti-terrorism laws began on Monday and made the platform’s 1.3 million users (HALF of the Internet population of PNG) unable to log in. Authorities claim the action aims to protect citizens from harmful online content, but critics call it authoritarian power, seized on freedom of speech.

Government defends the ban

Papua New Guinea Police Minister Peter Tsiamalili said the closure ensured “responsible use” of social media, believing that platforms such as Facebook enable fake news, child exploitation and violence. But opposition leaders and media advocates lashed out the decision as “tyranny” and human rights violations. Opposition lawmaker Allan Bird warned that anti-terrorism laws granted officials unrestricted power, calling the move “harsh”. PNG Media Council Chairman Neville Choi accused the government of overrevealing politics, stressing that Facebook is an important forum for public debate.

Economic and regional impacts

The ban undermines PNG’s informal economy, and many small businesses rely on Facebook for sale. John Pora, head of small and medium-sized enterprise companies, noted that thousands of informal traders are now facing uncertainty. Meanwhile, PNG’s National ICT Authority claims this is not aware of the closure plan, which is inconsistent with the police minister’s claim to inter-agency coordination. The incident reflects the 2021 attempt by Solomon Islands to ban Facebook, which failed after public outcry.

FAQ:

Why is Papua New Guinea blocking Facebook?
The government claims it is a “test” to reduce hate speech and misinformation, but critics believe it will inhibit free expression.

How does this affect our readers?
It reflects the global challenge of balancing security online with free speech, a key issue in the US technology policy debate.

Disclaimer: This content is written by a third party. The views expressed here are the views of the respective authors/entities and do not represent the views of the Economic Times (ET). ET does not warrant, warrant, or endorse any of its contents, nor is it responsible for them in any way. Please take all necessary steps to make sure that any information and content provided is correct, updated and verified. ET hereby disclaims any warranties, express or implied, relating to the Report and any Content.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button