BJP tries to “erase Shivaji” by pursuing Aurangzeb:Shiv Sena (UBT)

After the violence on March 17, the curfew was still in effect among the 10 police station restrictions, and the outbreak in Nagpur on March 17, which was still in effect among the 10 police station restrictions. |Picture source: ANI

In Maharashtra’s political dispute surrounding the grave of Aurangzeb, opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) Ally Shiv Sena (UBT) attacked BJP, attacked BJP to more important than Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaji.

Read also | Peaceful return to Nagpur; 84 people were detained by police

Shiv Sena (UBT) slammed BJP for using Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and Chhatrapati Sambhaji Raje on Wednesday (19 March 2025), whenever it was convenient. They are never symbols of RSS or BJP ideology.

Party mouthpiece editorial Samanatitled ‘Aurangya Toch by BJP Nava Shivaji (Aurangzeb is BJP’s new Shivaji). The twist of history. ”

“The decree of chhatrapati shivaji maharaj says if you find a copy of the Quran, please honor.

Edit the Grand Slam Fadnavis

Shiv Sena (UBT) has passed an editorial against Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis’ statement that the “pre-planned” Nagpur public conflict is “pre-planned” and that the government’s hands are tied up on the grave that demolished Aurangzeb because it is protected by Indian Paleologica Survey. The controversy began after Abu Azmi praised Aurangzeb in a statement. This led to the demands of BJP leader Udayanraje Bhosale for demolishing the graves of Aurangzeb.

“BJP MP Pradeep Purohit from Bargarh of Odisha publicly stated in Lok Sabha-‘Our Shivaji is Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Mr. Modi is Chhatrapati Shivaji. The BJP has born a new Lord Shivaji and plans to destroy the original Shivaji Maharaj.” It wonders if the descendants of Chhatrapati, Udayanaraje Bhosale and Shivendraraje Bhosale, agree with Mr. Modi’s glory?

Shiv Sena (UBT) called for an end to the dramatic drama and to remove the protected monument label as the BJP ruled the drama in the center and state to prevent riots and quell the fanatics in the state.

The editorial also mentioned recent community violence, including the violence of Rajapur-Ratnagiri, the Parbhani riots and the Beed murder. “The speech delivered by the minister of the country has increased religious hatred and the minister of the interior sits around and does nothing, and this is not rule.”

It also quoted the Babri mosque incident and said: “Unlike the Babri situation, Karseva, as a twin-engine government, ruled in Maharashtra that unlike the Babri situation, the situation is different from the Babri situation.