Although Nirav’s barrister was not tried based on “long time” and he advocated bail from London’s Thames prison, the judge emphasized the limitations of the “confidential” process, and even legal proceedings related to his ferry prevented him from surrendering to Indian authorities, his restrictions also prevented him from surrendering to Indian authorities.
“There is a ‘legal reason’ related to the ‘confidential process’. The nature of the applicant (Nirav Modi) and his attorneys know is known; this is what the Ministry of the Home Office knows, but CPS has not yet known except for what I record. [Crown Prosecution Service] Judge Fordham said.
CPS barrister Nicholas Hearn, who appeared on behalf of the Indian authorities, confirmed to the court that he “recognized and respected the facts of “existing confidential barriers” and their confidentiality facts “whether it is for the reasons for the compliance with confidentiality).
“In this case, the court should proceed with the same recognition and respect. But the result is: Is there a significant limit to whether there is a major limitation when the court considers the risks and effects in this case, considering the current long-term adoption, when the judge ends his rule.
The confidential process, believed to be mentioned at various court hearings related to Nirav Modi, is considered to refer to asylum applications, but the exact nature of the matter is unclear. Meanwhile, Nirav has remained in prison in London since his arrest in March 2019 and has been on bail attempts all turned down because he posed a flight risk. Judge Fordham said he believes he believes the latest bail application is “re-” and “cleaning board” legal appropriateness.
Judge Fordham’s verdict said: “I have carefully considered the views on the cost of human detention. This includes all the key points about physical and mental health, including delays in worsening and treatment, and concerns that are very appropriately raised in the expert evidence of clinicians.”
It said: “I also considered evidence about the prospect of attacks and threats and coercion…but I cannot conclude that when other relevant features of the case work side by side, they can be used to replace or undermine the assessment I described (oppose bail).
In India, there are three groups of criminal proceedings against Nirav Modi – the fraud case (CBI) case in the Punjab National Bank (PNB), the law enforcement bureau (ED) case (ED) case (related to the alleged robbery of the fraud, and the third group of criminal proceedings suspected of litigation involving CBI and witness litigation.
In April 2021, then-UK Home Secretary Priti Patel faced these charges in Indian court after an extradition case against him.
