“She has my heart, but she wants my soul
– I must admit, I stole it
From the poet who won the Nobel Prize
Because it expresses the whole accurately
What happened to us is wrong in love
– Although life is short, it can still extend love
A happy state, a poet can also sing
A verse that can be called a song of redemption? ”
Rubaiyat from Bachchoo
Just as the British judicial requirement is considered innocent until it is proven guilty through a legitimate legal process, so if the process causes you to commit a crime until it is proven innocent. This requires an appeal or retrial of new evidence.
In one of the most popular trials in Britain in recent history, a 34-year-old nurse named Lucy Letby was convicted in 2024 for murdering seven babies and murdering seven times in the countess of Chester Hospital where she worked.
Lebby faces two trials at Manchester Crown Court. The first one has resulted in the jury being unable to reach a consensus on the verdict. The second charge was her murder of seven very young babies and sentenced her to 15 “full life” prison sentences. Is she the Herod king of England today?
The evidence for conviction is mainly evidence from medical experts, and some inferences from the notes in her personal diary.
However, as the National Health Agency investigates the conditions and loose customs of the Countess department of the Infant Countess, the National Health Agency has launched a unanimous campaign to have begun to regard Lucy Lebby’s conviction as a serious judicial crisis.
The leading UK satirical and investigative magazine, Private Eyes, is dedicated to publishing news about the campaign to prove Laibi’s innocence.
Mark McDonald, the attorney in charge of Lebby’s defense, is providing evidence to the Criminal Case Review Commission (CCRC). Lebby’s defense team has already conducted perspectives and investigations on the death of infants by an international team of neonatologists and pediatric experts, who say their detailed and diligent analysis has no evidence that Letbo has harmed any infants.
Mr McDonald’s will also publish a separate report with seven medical experts claiming that insulin test results for two so-called infant victims, labeled Baby F and Baby L, and the jury concluded that Lebby was poisoned and that they were unreliable.
Lebby’s legal team requested her case to be forwarded to the Court of Appeal for a full hearing.
If and when the CCRC and the Court of Appeal agreed to review the Letby case, they would inevitably face detailed medical considerations and may be ambivalent new decisive views from higher qualified doctors who have come forward primarily to defend Letby and provide opinions that conflict with her guilty charges. Both institutions must rely on the explanations of these medical experts.
In addition, the 14 medical experts qualified in the field will provide evidence to the CCRC and the Court of Appeal as follows:
“Baby 1: (called Child A in the trial): The boy was murdered by injecting blood into the blood, which caused an air embolism in which bubbles formed and blocked the blood supply. The team found no evidence of air embolism and said the child died of a thrombosis, which formed a blood clot in the container.”
The group’s report considered 17 alleged murders against Lebby and came to the same conclusion. She did not do anything to prosecute the allegations.
However, there was a sensational news last week, which could have covered all the medical evidence. The newspaper first posted an email in Sunday’s email, which was sent to his colleagues on May 4, 2017 by Dr. Ravi Jayaram, senior pediatrician at the Countess of Chester Hospital.
The email clearly shows that Lucy Letby noticed signs of “low saturation” in one of the babies in her care. According to the email, Dr. Jayalam said she immediately summoned him and he came to find the baby in the incubator. The email also said that baby K’s fragile premature birth status was the cause of her death: “The baby then deteriorated and eventually died, but the surrounding events were consistent with interpretable events related to extreme premature birth.” Clear enough.
but! Dr. Jayaram was a witness prosecuting a 2024 murder case against Letby when he wrote to his professional colleagues in a May 2017 email.
Dr. Jayaram appeared in both 2024 trials, Lightby was on the side of Baby K’s incubator and was suspicious. The prosecutor asked him if he had “Lucy Letby’s help?”, and he replied: “No. No.”
The prosecution made him the main witness, and he grabbed Wright’s “Red Hand”. Now, the email proves that his evidence is contradiction and lies. Some reports suggest friendship and dating relationships between married, son and Dr. Jayalam, who is Lebby.
Senior nurses at the hospital said they thought Lebby was innocent and attributed the hateful testimony of some doctors to the fact that Lebby complained that they bullied the caregiver.
Why Dr. Jayaram set out to sentence Letby has not been explained yet.
