Hunting transactions for hedge funds in risk schemes are too expensive for insurance companies
(Bloomberg) – Los Angeles residents digested the apocalyptic scene left by wildfires earlier this year, while setting hedge funds to pursue market gains radiated by climate change.
The relevant investment model is built around so-called substructure claims, which insurance companies use to recover some of the funds they pay to policyholders. When an insurer suspects that a third party (such as a utility) is ultimately responsible for the loss, the insurer resorts to subordinates. However, insurers did not respond to the recovery risks themselves, but instead sold these claims to alternative investment managers.
Bradley Max, director of the New York Investment Bank, said the Cherokee acquisition has recently facilitated sub-order deals for “larger, more complex debt hedge funds.” He said the deal was closely related to claims related to the Eaton and Palisade fires.
Bloomberg previously reported that other investment firms looking to make money from claims from the Los Angeles fire include Oppenheimer & Co. , the company recently executed a subsidiary claim trade. According to Max, investors have paid about 40 cents to 45 cents.
As climate change leads to increasingly devastating natural disasters and uncontrollable property losses, the question of who ends up in trouble is more controversial than ever.
Fiona Chaney, senior investment manager and legal counsel at Omni Bridgeway, an expert in claim claims and other forms of litigation financing, said the company is preparing for market growth as “claims are getting bigger.” The goal of subordinate claims has been “repayed and paid and paid from many large wildfires”, so the motivations of insurers and investors are obvious, she said.
According to Munich RE, natural disasters last year destroyed everything from critical infrastructure to private homes around the world, with insurance losses reaching $140 billion. German Reinsurance described the development as a series of record-breaking events with “destructive consequences.” Munich re-estimates that natural disasters caused $320 billion in losses in 2024, including those covered by insurance.
It is widely believed that insurance companies alone cannot meet the coverage needs related to climate change costs. In Europe, regulators warn that widening gaps in natural inventory insurance protection require a series of new policy responses. According to discussion papers published by the European Central Bank and the European Insurance and Occupational Pension Authority, which includes greater capital market participation.
The role of capital markets in helping insurers cope with their growing costs often focuses on products like insurance-connected securities, including disaster bonds. But as natural twists and turns of losses surge, other investment models related to insurance also accompany.
Fifty years ago, there was a precise moment for the market to invest in substructure claims. At that time, hedge fund Baupost Group LLC purchased a claim against PG&E for $6.8 billion, and it was believed that it was believed that it was believed that Bloomberg’s profit at the time was estimated to have made an estimated $1 billion in profit.
A Baupost spokesman declined to comment.
Max said investors have increasingly seen “opportunities to provide liquidity to insurers” since the PG&E case. Often, he said, they are looking for rewards in “low teenagers.”
Since transactions are limited to over-the-counter transactions, there is little data on price or quantity. But those close to the market agree that, according to Michel Léonard, chief economist at the Insurance Information Association, the return on “double digits” is the standard.
Léonard said hedge funds, private equity firms and other alternative investment managers are “considering the context of insurance and thinking, ‘how we invest and withdraw returns’.” He said the risk-reward schemes they face are creating “consistent appetite.”
For insurance companies, it’s about managing liquidity.
Cherokee’s best view is that going on the road to litigation “can be long and expensive.” The insurer selling its claims will receive “today’s cash” without waiting for a resolution with uncertain results. “It’s part of the incentive market,” he said.
In addition to claims closely related to the California fires, Cherokee also “trades” for substructure claims related to the Hawaiian fires and the losses caused by the storm in Texas, Max said.
For insurers, it’s a problem: “Use opportunities to eliminate risks and profit from their substructure claims,” Max said.
(A AI digest was removed after interpreting “even” as a larger number than “low teenagers”)
More stories like this are available Bloomberg.com
