India-US Trade Agreement: India and the United States are now much better than they were a few years ago. But U.S. President Donald Trump’s flip-flops are making it vulnerable to vulnerability. The U.S. president rang the bell in New Delhi when Trump imposed reciprocity tariffs on India that was subsequently reversed, but in the wake of the India-Pakistan skirmish. Trump said he used trade as a threat to get India and Pakistan to agree to a ceasefire. This marks one of the rare events in global diplomacy, where the current president’s remarks are absolutely rejected by the partner state. The Foreign Ministry said no trade-related remarks were made during the talks on the India-Parker ceasefire between India and the United States. Trump later claimed that India provided zero tariffs at reciprocity rates. Again, his statement conflicts with Dr. Eam S Jaishankar. “Between India and the United States, trade negotiations are going on. These are complex negotiations. Until nothing is decided. Any trade agreement must be mutually beneficial; it must work for both countries. This will be what we expect from a trade agreement. Until the judgment on it is made, any judgment on it is too early,” Jaishankar said. ”
It is worth noting that the total goods transaction between the United States and India is estimated to be in 2024. In 2024, the U.S. exports to India were US$41.8 billion, an increase of 3.4% (US$1.4 billion) from 2023. The total amount of goods imported from India from the United States was $87.4 billion in 2024, announcing $450 million ($370 million ($37 billion), both of which announced from 20223 that the company announced ‘andra”andra””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””’
Trump’s remarks have caused tremors in India, and people question whether New Delhi can trust Washington in its support for Pakistan. Former Indian Foreign Minister Kanwal Sibal said Trump’s remarks about India in Doha were full of misinformation and political insensitivity. “Even when the two sides negotiated a trade agreement, he still criticized India as the tariff king. Trump claimed that the United States was not completely wrong even among the top 30 countries exported to India. The United States is India’s fourth largest exporter, second only to China, Russia and the UAE. Why not introduce him to him correctly?” Sibar said.
He continues to criticize Trump’s zero tariff claims. “Then he mistakenly claimed that India proposed a zero tariff system. Regarding agriculture? As for the apple manufacturing industry in India, when the supply chain shifts to India’s supply chains, his goal is widely accepted is ideal. If he doesn’t want American companies to make India in India, then what is all this talk about in India what is the 21st century defining relationship?” Sibar said.
The former secretary said Trump devalued India-U.S. connections both bilaterally and internationally through his uneliminated conversations.
Michael Rubin, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Academy, wrote in his blog that he brags about how he uses trade to stop the fight, not only Trump has proposed a moral equivalent between terror-initiated Pakistan and terror Viktim India, but he has signaled to India that we have signaled to India that our Ministry of Defense will endanger the future of its defense supply chain.
“Trump has traded for a few seconds now, boasting about what he calls the role of the ceasefire. Coupled with the insult of injury, his comments are posted in front of Modi. Otherwise it seems to be a clear victory for Pakistan. By bragging, how he stops trade to fight trade, not only fights between terrorists, but also wins terrorists among terrorists, but has been hit by terrorists, but he boasts about his own terrorists – in the long run, the U.S. leader will endanger its defense supply chain.
India insists that trade talks are in progress and it is too early to comment on the same deal, former ambassador Manjeev Puri said this is not the time to jump the gun.
“Trump makes tariffs the focus of his achievements and policies. It’s a reputation for him. He’s happy to tell the world that no one uses tariffs the way I do. That’s his role. He will continue to say what he wants to say. On the other hand, within the interests and best scope of the government, we should work hard in the situation of endeavor and decisions, and that’s in the scope of the end. Negotiations are always two-way streets,” Puri said.
Although everyone is concerned about the India-US trade agreement, Trump’s remarks have caused damage. Trump has just reached billions of dollars in comments at the potential Indian Ministry of Defense, saying he uses trade as an obligation to put pressure on India, feeling experts. Although his comments have made the United States an unreliable partner, it depends entirely on how India views this information. But there is no doubt that India will now be more cautious when reaching a defense agreement with the United States.
