The court pointed out that the restriction period had failed in 2024 on March 16, 2024, and pointed out that the Judicial Court has set the allowed free construction as a restriction period.
The judge said the court held that Chauhan was “whimsical and opportunistic” to the 2018 annual press conference when he filed a belated complaint of defamation, and it was not until December 2024 to target the defendant Saurabh Bharadwaj in the early 2025 Delhi parliamentary elections.
Chauhan claimed Bharadwaj slandered him in 2018 because he claimed in a press conference that FIR had targeted him.
He claimed before the special judge that he had filed a complaint against former Delhi minister Bharadwaj, not at the Saket Court, not the Rouse Avenue court, which appeared in September 2020 for consideration.
He said he withdrew Saket’s complaint in November 2022, and as a result, the complaint case was filed in Rouse Avenue Court on December 12, 2024. However, the judge said the Judicial Court had placed the allowed free structure to a limiting period, i.e., excluding the long-term phase from January 7, 2020 to July 1, 2022, when the cause of the lawsuit itself emerged on September 20, 2018. The restricted deadline was found, found on March 16, 2024, and charged on March 16, 2024, with the delay in the lawsuit. 270 days, calculated from March 16, 2024.
“When the revisionists fail to show conviction through their own remedies, this will be a case of placement of the court’s liberal approach that violates the substantive law of restriction,” the judge said.
“The reasons for urging in the amendment petition have not been successfully determined by any illegal, wrong or misconduct ordered. The amendment petition was dismissed.”
On February 19, a judicial court rejected Qiao Han’s plea, saying the alleged defamation occurred in September 2018, and observed a three-year restriction period for filing a complaint.
The magistrate said Johan begged for any reason to seek delayed surrender.
It held that: “The complainant has no right to collect tolerance for delaying the filing of the complaint. Therefore, this application was dismissed.”
