Court of Appeal: Prince Harry arrives in London court for the last day of hearing in security appeal
Prince Harry opposes the intention of the UK Home Office to lower its security classification after performing its royal duties in 2020. The 40-year-old Duke of Sussex arrived from California to attend the hearing. He challenged the rejection of legal requirements for the Ministry of the Interior. According to media reports, Prince Harry argued that the evacuation of full police protection in the UK has made it unnecessary for him and his family – Wife Meghan Markle and children Archie and Lilibet’s children to take risks.
Lawyer says Prince Harry was “picked out”
Prince Harry’s lawyer, the lawyer Shaheed Fatima KC, reportedly claimed that the Executive Committee on the Protection of Royal and Public Figures (RAVEC) failed to comply with the appropriate provisions when reviewing his case.
According to GB News, she said Ravec has instead created a unique “customized” arrangement, which is neither fair nor appropriate. Fatima told the court that Prince Harry believed the customization was inconsistent, adding that it did show that he was picked out for unfair and unfair treatment.
According to the independent report, Fatima also believes that RAVEC did not have an Advisory Risk Management Committee (INMB), an expert in assessing threats by a professional body. She observed that this was a deviation from the committee’s standard practice.
Also Read: Masters 3 Stroke Competition: When Where Where Where Where to Watch 2025 Masters in Augusta Country
Public meeting ends, closed hearing continues
The report further added that most hearings will be held on April 9 due to the sensitivity of the security details involved. In these discussions, it is reported that a comparison between Harry and other VIPs with state-funded protection may be discussed.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle gave up their royal duties in January 2020. They invoked inadequate support from institutions and a desire for financial independence. His legal team stressed that the couple hoped to continue serving the late Queen Elizabeth in a privately funded capacity.
Internal office refuses to claim
The Ministry of Home Affairs reportedly argued that Prince Harry’s team had been missing wood from trees. They defended the decision-making process of RAVEC. They insisted that Harry’s royal identity changes required a different approach to his security.
The alleged ongoing legal battle, which is reportedly costing more than £500,000, has been under public scrutiny.
FAQ
1. Why does Prince Harry file a lawsuit against the Ministry of the Interior?
He made a call, deciding to reject his automatic state-funded security guard in the UK, citing it at risk of exposing him and his family.
2. What is RAVEC and why is this a core case?
RAVEC (Protecting Concessions and Public Personnel Protection Committee) is the agency responsible for allocating security arrangements. Harry claims it created a unique and unfair arrangement for him, bypassing expert threat assessments.
Disclaimer: This content is written by a third party. The views expressed here are the views of the respective authors/entities and do not represent the views of the Economic Times (ET). ET does not warrant, warrant, or endorse any of its contents, nor is it responsible for them in any way. Please take all necessary steps to make sure that any information and content provided is correct, updated and verified. ET hereby disclaims any warranties, express or implied, relating to the Report and any Content.
