However, CJI praised SCBA president and senior advocate Kapil Sibal and Vice President Rachna Srivastava for their existence before the lawsuit, although the bar agency did not hold regular functions for Justice Trivedi at night.
He said: “I thank Kapil Sibal and Rachna Srivastava for being here. But the position taken by the association, I have to publicly abstain from it… In this case, the association should not take that position.”
“So, I publicly thank Sibal and Srivastava for their existence. Although their bodies have solved it, they are here. However, the association has lost what the entire house here has been present, proving that she is a very good judge. There are different types of judges, but that should not be denied a factor that should be awarded to CJI.”
Judge Masih responded to a similar view.
“It’s strange, as the Chief (CJI) has expressed, I feel sorry, but I must say traditions need to be followed and respected. I believe good traditions should always continue,” Judge Masih said. In his speech, CJI praised Justice Trivedi for rising from the regional judici to the Supreme Court and providing justice with hard work and dedication. “She should always be known for her fairness, firmness, prudence, hard work, dedication, dedication, industry, integrity….” Cji Gavai said the Supreme Court recognized Justice Trivedi’s integrity and fairness.
Cji Gavai said: “She has always been known for her hard work and integrity.
In practice, the SCBA held a farewell function to retire the Supreme Court judge, and the Trivedi case also had excellent decisions, which may be due to certain decisions with lawyers who belong to the bar agency’s decision.
Justice Trivedy, who was considered a strong judge, ordered a CBI investigation into a few lawyers to file a false complaint in the Supreme Court for alleged use of a fake “Vakaltnama” (authorization authority).
She rejected many lawyer leaders’ mercy for lawyers.
Recently, Justice Trivedy later refused to accept their apology after calling for misconduct in defending some advocates.
At the hearing, she believed some bar association leaders forced her not to pass harsh orders against other lawyers.
