Congress asked, did the government accept the US mediation in Kashmir? Accuses us of trying to get a mixed bag with Indian, Parker

He noted that events have occurred within the last 24 hours, saying: “We are all surprised after the U.S. president announced a ceasefire through social media.”
“Trying to internationalize the problem between India and Pakistan. This is the first time it has happened,” he said, asserting that the government must clarify while bringing the country and all parties to confidence.
“I mean, the United States unilaterally declared a ceasefire between the two countries. It’s unprecedented, never happened before, and they tried to swallow the discussion to involve Kashmir, which is unprecedented again.
“To say they will meet at neutral locations, who they decide what neutral locations are, who should meet.” On Sunday, government sources said India would never accept mediation on Kashmir, and the only thing to be discussed is Pakistan’s return to its illegally occupied territory. The pilot said POK is part of India and we were determined to recapture Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (POK) in 1994.
“Have there been any changes in the position? What are the conditions, what are the situations, the questions they are going to talk about and who is the third country that calls for India – where and when we should meet and how we should meet, this is a question that needs to be answered.”
Foreign Minister Vikram Misri announced on Saturday that India and Pakistan have learned to stop all shooting and military operations on land, air and ocean immediately and take effect immediately.
“In the conditions of announcing a ceasefire, what guarantees are not repeated, as yesterday’s incidents have no credibility (breach). How can we trust them, and the guarantee that such developments will not happen again?” asked the pilot.
Congress leaders say it is also important to note what U.S. President Donald Trump wrote on his social media post, where he made a statement in Kashmir, where the administration should articulate its side. “Kashmir is a bilateral issue and I don’t think it’s appropriate to try to internationalize it.
“Convening a special meeting and again adopting the resolution of 1994 can make it clear that third parties will not be accepted.
He asserted: “It should be made clear that third parties will not be accepted for participation. This is a bilateral issue, it is a problem for India and Pakistan, and there should be no room for countries without the United States to intervene in bilateral issues.”
The pilot said the Indian government received unprecedented support from all parties and people after the Pahargam attack.
He also asserted that the valor, valor and professionalism of the Indian armed forces were second to none.
He said: “I call on the Government to convene an immediate party-wide meeting. We are all proud of all our soldiers and armed forces’ actions that have been done by all our lessons in Pakistan. We are proud of the actions taken by our armed forces.”
He said several problems have emerged following the announcement made by the U.S. on social media.
“Did the government accept this kind of mediation? Under what conditions did the government accept it? This raises the question.” He said in a reference to Kashmir’s U.S. statement that the conversation would take place at a “neutral location.”
“The U.S. president mistakenly said that they had fought for thousands of years and had forgotten the two countries a few years ago.
“This is again an attempt to integrate India and Pakistan, as well as a bailout from such an IMF. If a ceasefire is announced from Washington, it would raise several questions.”
“They tried to bring us back a hyphen, which I don’t think is a positive development,” he noted.
He also said that the remarks of the former chief of the Indian army must be paid attention to.
The pilot said the violations following the ceasefire declaration also raised several questions and doubts about whether they would repeat such attacks from the border.
“I feel we should convene a full-party meeting and… the Prime Minister should attend the meeting. The Prime Minister should bring the entire country and all political parties to confidence in the developments,” the pilot said.
He recalled that during the 1971 war, the United States had said that they had deployed the 7th Fleet in the Gulf of Bengal, and he said that the government, led by Indira Gandhi, then continued to move forward and did things in the highest national interest. “We remember the government where national interests were supreme.”