If the people and institutions were to evaluate their commanders, the judiciary might be the weakest of the pillars of democracy, but it gained strength from the moral highs of itself claimed. There are many elements to maintain this place, including its handling of important fairness, the impartiality it demonstrates when asked to adjudicate complex issues and transparency in the work of the agency. The latest decision by the Supreme Court of India to receive annual asset statements on its website is a landmark that will add to the glory of the institution.
Today, 21 of the Supreme Court’s 33 judges have been issued in the statement, and the asset statements of other judges will also be issued in accordance with the Supreme Court’s submission. The process will reach its logical end when other judges, as well as other judges in the High Court, follow their steps and declare their assets for public viewing. At some point, it can also be extended to the lower judiciary.
There have been allegations of corruption against the judiciary at all levels, brought by members of the Legal Brotherhood itself.
A Supreme Court judge recorded that half of all judges in the senior judiciary were corrupt, and the investigation noted that there was little respect for the judiciary. It’s not that the judge didn’t know they had been hit by Muke, but that he didn’t try to correct the mistake seriously. Publication of assets of the land Supreme Court members may be seen as the first step in cleaning up chaos.
