The relief after the truce was announced, regardless of the early violations in Pakistan, most heard in the border areas and in Jam & Kashmir, residents experienced four days of hell experience from May 7.
Regardless of the situation where Pakistani troops call on DGMO in India and seek to stop hostilities and the honor of U.S. President Donald Trump jumped off the gun to claim himself as his ancestor, the truce will be welcomed wholeheartedly.
Even in the most modern era drones, missiles and border gunfights, hostilities are in vain. Even the infamous terror sponsor as a Pakistani weapon of Justice Craft, this action and counter-effect may have left some room for thought it has been better communicated.
Although it is very easy to launch a war, even if it is legally a counterattack by Pakistan in an operation that causes terrorist attacks on innocent tourists, it is never easy to stop an attack. The credibility must be attributed to all the international powers such as the United States, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf countries, which have been reminding India and Pakistan to immediately stop the war journey and take dialogue and diplomacy as the way forward.
India, in its fight back for the Palwama massacre in which victims identified their victims through religious identity, conveyed the strongest message of Pakistan to Pakistan to begin with a sponsored terrorist incident, as a series of incidents began with the 2001 attacks on parliament in 2001 and the 26/11 strike on Mumbai in 2008.
Any blackmail threat from nuclear war can only be issued by irrational leaders. It can be assumed that Pakistan could be the worst case of damage caused by projectile attacks, requiring superpowered mediation to sign hostilities, as it has done since 1965, or surrendered like it did in 1971.
It is often said that although all countries have military forces, only in Pakistan does the Army have a country. At that time, the United States had the responsibility to talk to the religiously inculcated general through the Secretary of State because the civilian government in Islamabad had little credibility and actually lacked legitimacy.
India has conveyed a strong message in nine terror nurseries and poks that destroyed Pakistan and has taken strategic moves such as a reexamination of the Indian Waters Treaty. Furthermore, the message is now conveyed that any repetition of sponsored terrorist incidents will be interpreted as an act of war and responded appropriately.
India has the ability to absorb four days of losses from the air and on the ground, but the hell experienced by people in border countries shows that more efforts must be taken to secure their lives through a continuous vigil, which is the price of preparing for the spirit of opposing the neighbors.
From here, what it has to do is not letting it down in J&K after a serious security lapse caused the Pahalgam incident. To recognize the unity most J&K people show, they must recognize their place in the mainstream, except for the sympathy they deserve when they work to make their lives better.
The level of deterrence is evident from the less damage caused by the drone strikes caused by India, but the death of civilians living under unparalleled border shelling will continue to remind us what the country must deal with when it comes to Pakistan. Currently, the truce brings breathing space to try dialogue and diplomacy to try to shape a better future.
