Aurangzeb had to sleep peacefully in his grave in Khuldabad in the Aurangabad/Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar region, and people fought for it three centuries after their death. After the demise of the people he ruled, several foreign powers, including Britain. They bravely sacrificed thousands of lives and achieved freedom. They also rejected the jurisdiction of religious rulers, and although divided in the name of faith, they still constitute the largest secular democracy in the world.
Now one wants to declare that the last powerful Mughal emperor was a savage who tortured, ridiculed and killed his relatives to realize his power and retained power, and therefore his grave should be removed, even if others wanted to remember that as a frugal man, he despised luxury, and that history devalued him long after his death. Although many say he plundered religious places, others think he helped establish the shrine and even represented other faiths. India is a democracy that takes freedom of speech and expression as its fundamental right and must ensure that all of these people openly and peacefully profess their beliefs. They should be able to tell their fellow citizens to learn the right lessons from the past so that we, as a people, focus on uniting our daily problems and prepare for a better tomorrow for future generations. This is the requirement of civilization progress; this is the requirement of the Constitution that Indian citizens are required.
Sadly, it has been a while since in India. Over time, there is a group of people who discover historical errors and hope they correct them now. They put religion on the shield so that people who really need to solve the problem can blindly support them. They claim that the rule of law does not apply to the problem when religious issues are threatened.
Such people returned to Nagpur to operate, hoping that the tomb of the Mughal emperor would be demolished. They are willing to be sucked in order to achieve this. Then there is the honor of the savior of the same man who died about 300 years ago. They also have no responsibility for resorting to violence to accomplish their mission. When governments in power books are inciting worshippers of rulers of the era, things won’t get worse, or in fact more surreal.
Religious passion is exacerbating this issue and should not be the concern of the government to demand the upholding of the rule of law. It should be ruthlessly applied to the suffering of anyone seeking to suppress peace and make the ordinary people live. Businesses that find historical reasons for sowing hatred seeds have no place in civilized society. It’s even more ironic when it’s done in the name of men, as RSS leaders say, “It doesn’t matter today.”
