DC Editor | Pakistan must pay attention to global requests and end all hostilities immediately
Pakistan attempted to attack Indian military facilities in at least 24 cities in the north and west of the country but was repelled. India’s integrated air defense system, the S-400 missile shield, comes from Russia, plays a star role and occupies about 500 drones, which is much better than the Chinese air defense shield deployed by Pakistan.
India’s revenge is a revenge on Pakistan’s blatant support for terrorism and its military misfortune, once a general’s fanatic who once ruled the ISI was different from previous surgical strikes. Hostiles in 2025 are much more intense than before, as drone warfare has been raging.
Pakistan has not attempted to use cross-border shelling to strong attacks on civilians in houses, which constitutes an act of war, even if it can claim that India’s cross-border strike against terror is a war. India’s concentrated operation of Sindor, crossing the border, while targeting only terrorists in Pakistan and Pokle, the terrorists shot down at least nine Pakistani terrorist exits, is a calibrated response to Pakistan’s Pahalgam terrorist attack on tourists.
India has to strengthen and release its offensive capabilities against Pakistan’s cities, thanks solely to the escalation of conflict between Pakistan and its missiles and missiles and drones targeting Indian military facilities and civilian areas. According to the Indian Defense Forces, retribution has been overwhelming. The two countries may have lost some aircraft, but other than that, communications in Pakistan have become worse as their major cities blown from Indian drones and their payload ammunition hits the ground, rather than the failure of Pakistan’s war machine to create dents.
World powers are hardly able to save on restraint of advice, then dialogue and diplomacy.
However, India has determined that it will no longer tolerate Pakistan’s support for detailed playback of horror films in Jamu and Kashmir. Pakistan’s respect for militants, and the strikes on the army’s copper tubes and the coffin covered with national flags would not attract people’s attention during the Indian attacks.
It is fascinating that a country on the verge of economic collapse that needs the bailout of global institutions such as the IMF and the World Bank will demonstrate the courage of military operations against neighboring countries and can still seek more funds around that could strengthen military spending. India’s diplomatic offensive aims to stop the abundance of this bailout bowl, even as beneficiaries exert military power in responding to the placement optimism of military operations.
Pakistan may have noticed that the United States also demanded that Pakistan specifically stop supporting terrorism, with clichés suggesting on both sides. Whether it would recognize that information about avoiding terror in exchange for peace is a question, as India may be willing to cancel preemptive actions on the terrorist module if the cycle of hostilities ceases immediately. But a country that provides a safe haven for Osama bin Laden, but is still for banned international terrorists, may require more than just good intentions to change its attractions.
By using long-distance ammunition as a drone payload, its war machine ineffectiveness damages the ineffectiveness of the city may convince Pakistan and its armed forces that Buster will not take them anywhere. Maybe it’s time to follow China’s advice to a greater “peace and stability” interest.
