Two main members of the Tamil Nadu cabinet, K. Ponmudy and VV Senthilbalaji, resigned, succumbed to judicial interventions, paving the way for ministerial reorganization, a welcome development that would uphold ethical values in a truly democratic fashion. Although it lasted for several weeks on the card, part of the removal of ministers who made mistakes in different ways should be attributed to Chief Minister MK Stalin. Because unlike other leaders involved in the past with other courts, Stalin did not try to cover up his ministerial colleagues, although one was an ancient war rooted in Dravid’s tradition and the other was a modern stage of the party.
Despite being sentenced to three years in prison in a corruption case and having appealed the order, he has been under serious judicial scrutiny in a case filed by the Law Enforcement Bureau (ED), but they were sentenced to appeal in bail. It is natural that the long arms of the law suddenly hit them in different forms.
Madras High Court commented at a meeting that den destroyed women, as well as Hindu religious denominations of vaishnavites and shaivites, and the Supreme Court told him that the Supreme Court told him that he was released on bail and that he was not conducive to his senior position, and that when he was released, the Ponzi judge was demeaning women, as well as Hindu religious denominations of senthilbalaji, and told Suo Motu at a senthilbalaji and was released for his senior position.
The lack of unnecessary objections to the court’s observations on the political stage has hindered the modern trend of questioning judicial statements in the public sphere and attempting to portray it as a lawsuit against the freedom of legislation, and ministers also followed the parties to the court to encourage the decision. However, the former minister and DMK could have avoided the deadline for the court to make a decision between freedom and ministerial positions, or order the police to know the words of the Minister of Education.
Senthilbalaji’s so-called crime of money laundering is so serious that the DMK leadership avoids returning him to the cabinet after he is released from prison, and Ponmudy, as a senior leader of the Dravidian movement, should exercise restrictiveness rather than rash and vulgarity.
The artificial pas of the former minister may not have attracted attention, but due to the spread of social media, these social media dug out videos a few days after the actual occurrence and made him eagerly seek cover. Similarly, if Senthilbalaji waited to clear all charges raised by ED, rather than being found in a position of power after being released on bail, the latest setback to his political career could have been avoided.
The developments in Tamil Nadu came from a lip balm for the wounded souls of the country, who believed that moral values in public life were lost, which we now know now did not completely disappear.
