HC directs the HCA Management Committee not to take any decision involving financial issues

Hyderabad: The High Court of Telangana has directed the Hyderabad Cricket Association (HCA) and its President to not take any administrative or policy decisions involving financial matters, except to pay salaries to their employees and their associations.

High Court Judge CV Bhaskar Reddy issued an interim direction in a petition filed by the Telangana Cricket Association (TCA) that calls for instructions to the state government, BCCI and CBI to investigate the HCA and take alleged fraudulent transactions and other appropriate relief against the HCA.

Senior Legal Counsel P. Raja Sripathi Rao appeared for the petitioner TCA, who believes the HCA governing board is abused by its powers in funding expenditures. It is further proposed that the HCA president was disqualified from the election and had conducted an investigation into the treasurer in the past and found that he found he was responsible for misunderstandings or misuse of the association’s funds.

Senior legal counsel Sripathi Rao also caught the attention of the court, with the HCA president earlier representing Sri Chakra Cricket Club (formerly the Gowlipura Cricket Club). He suppressed the fact that he was disqualified from the election, and he debated the polls on behalf of the SRI Chakra Cricket Club and was elected as HCA President. Therefore, the HCA President has no authority to perform any duties, as the same duties may adversely affect the reputation and interests of the association.

It is further proposed that the Hyderabad Law Enforcement Authority (ED) attached real estate property to the Money Laundering Act (PMLA) (PMLA), and in 2002 its office shooting measures abused the HCA fund. ED investigations show that HCA Office-Bearers signed a contract to supply cricket to Sara Sports, and a contract to give Body Drench India Pvt to excellent businesses and fitness equipment. Co., Ltd., very expensive. The illegal financial gains obtained by the supplier, the proceeds of crime in the case (POC) were transferred to Surender Agarwal, former vice president and treasurer of the HCA, who served as Quid Pro Quo. It is further raised that Ed is investigating the case under several FIRs targeting HCA’s office businesses on charges of misappropriating funds.

Sripathi Rao also argued that in the treasurer involved in so-called fraudulent transactions, the HCA Executive Committee was making policy decisions to cover up its mistakes without maintaining the accounts, thus making the association’s affairs unhealthy.

Senior Legal Counsel J. Ramachander Rao attended the HCA, who proposed that the Supreme Court appointed investigative officer oversee the committee recently elected. He said the committee released its functions strictly in accordance with the HCA rules.

The judge believes that at the final hearing, the questions raised by both parties need to be decided. At the same time, he issued interim instructions that restricted the administration committee from making administrative or policy decisions involving financial issues. The judge detained the hearing until June 16.