Hyderabad:Justice NV Shravan Kumar of the High Court of Telangana will hear the complaint, challenging the rules set by the authorities of the Rajiv Gandhi International Airport (RGIA) in Hyderabad involving the handling of lost items. The judge is dealing with a written petition filed by advocate Fizani Husain, who questioned the legality and constitutionality of the airport’s loss and discovery procedures. The petitioner is attacking rules that prohibit victims or owners from entering lost rooms and viewing off road television videos to track lost items. The petitioner claims that these rules are arbitrary, leading to harassment and depriving the real owner of a fair opportunity to recover their property. The petitioner claimed that airport authorities did not disclose procedures for handling unclaimed lost items, raising concerns about transparency and accountability. The petitioner seeks instructions from the airport authorities to restore her missing registration bag marked with Indigo Airlines or to compensate her by paying Rs 1.5 lakh to the value of the lost item to cover the value of mental and physical harassment. The petitioner also seeks instructions from the airport authorities to immediately modify its rules to allow victims to access CCTV footage directly and rooms lost and found, and to strengthen security and vigilance at the airport. The judge ordered the interviewees to be notified.
HC pulls up college to stop students
Justice B. Vijaysen Reddy of the Telangana High Court condemned SVKM’s Narsee Monjee Management Institute on Monday for suspending last year’s law students two hours before his last exam. When the judge heard the lunch motion, on Monday morning, the judge observed that the actions taken by the college were “too harsh”. Anand Raj, a law student in the tenth semester, filed a writ request, believing that the communication before the exam was defended. The lawyer for petitioner S. Goutham believes Anand has no chance and the suspension will adversely affect his academic progress and may lead to the loss of the school year. The lawyer responded to Justice Reddy’s inquiry and informed the court of the food poisoning incident at the university, with about 170 students complaining about stomach pain and nausea. Of these, 37 students showed severe symptoms such as vomiting, dehydration and fever and needed hospitalization, as reported by the newspaper. After careful reading of the records, the judge directed the agency to allow Anand to appear in court for the remaining exams, which are scheduled to end on May 6. The lawyer asked the court to direct the college to conduct an investigation on April 28. The judge directed the attorney to provide personal notification to the university via email and WhatsApp and posted the matter on May 2.
Pleas for delayed police position
Telangana High Court Justice Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao proposed a proposal to challenge the inaction of the Employee Selection Committee and demand that an appointment order be issued in the Border Security Force for selected candidates of Constable (general duties), such as Indo Pibetan Border Police (ITBP). The date is October 27, 2022. The petitioner believes that despite their choice, the defendant authorities withheld the order on the grounds of so-called biometric mismatch. The petitioner believes that the defendant’s position is illegal, arbitrary, and constitutes hostile discrimination. The petitioner argued that despite months of this, the verification process about biometric technology was still waiting. The petitioner seeks instructions from the Ministry of the Interior of the Union and other authorities to issue an order of any corresponding interest immediately. The judge released the matter for further hearing.
HC: Eligibility specifications shall not be changed
Justice Nagesh Bheemapaka reiterated that the qualification criteria must be met on the date of notice and that changes cannot be made midway during the recruitment process, while shelving several candidates for the position of art teacher in the Residential Education Institution Society (REIS). The judge is dealing with a writ filed by Raghavapuram Srinu and nine others who argue that the unqualified individuals are included in the selection list. The petitioner applied for positions for VI and VI areas and barely missed the cutoff mark as he sought to disqualify the candidate and his qualifications on the selection list. TGPSC issued the original notice requiring candidates to have a Technical Certificate Course (TCC) in the drawings from the notice date. Several selected candidates were found to have received their certificates exclusively on April 26, 2017 only after the notification date. The judge pointed out that having a lower grade TCC is not enough and that the course must be clarified by information obtained under the Right to Information Act of 2005. The judge referred to the previous Supreme Court ruling and believed that hiring qualifications must be maintained in the case of restricted rules and that a consistent scope must be maintained unless well provisions are maintained on the date of completion – the Constitution. Therefore, the judge allowed a written petition to put aside the selection list within the scope of the inclusive candidates and directed the authorities to include qualified petitioners in a 1:1 ratio.
