J&K Government. Contradicting public stance to answer the High Court regarding reservation policy, Stokes Dispute

The official position of the National Conference of Ruling (NC) government on the reservation quota in Jamu and Kashmir was submitted to the High Court on Saturday, placing the Omar Abdullah government on the dock as it contrasts with the public stance adopted by his political party.

In the government’s reply to the petition seeking rationalization, the Social Welfare Department filed a “petition is an abuse of judicial proceedings, and has filed a lawsuit without any cause of action”.

It informed the court that the petitioner “made the current petition for totally false reasons to deceive the court.” ” …a face-to-face petition is an attempt to abuse judicial proceedings with ulterior motives and tilts the motorized motor. The petition (if permitted) will set false precedents to encourage uncontrolled litigants, for example, in this case, like the court’s honors that dissipate the valuable time and resources of the court in the honor,” J&k&k k.

It dismissed the petition “from the very beginning.” “The maintenance of the instant written petition is not that pleasant because the petitioner has no local stance to invoke Hon’ble Court’s extraordinary writ jurisdiction,” said the J&K government led by the NC.

The government faces strong public outcry against the department, led by senior North Carolina leader and minister Sakina Ittoo, who also runs the three-person cabinet subcommittee to study booking issues in J&K. Booking quota revised under the Center’s J&K rules reduces the public merit category to 40%.

“People should not focus on cheap politics. The affidavit submitted in the court is not the last word. If needed, the government will submit another affidavit to clarify or correct any issues. If the government of Omar Abdullah has formed a committee, that is a serious matter.

She said the government is committed to submitting reports on booking issues within six months. Ms Itoo said: “Retention is a sensitive (issue). Educational people are concerned about it. We review Mr. Abdullah every day, progress and expected development.”

Meanwhile, Waheed-ur-rehmaan Parra, accused the NC of retrospectively retracing its commitments. “If the government thinks we need to submit another affidavit and saying that reservation is wrong, we will do it. This line reveals everything – it acknowledges that the current affidavit filed in the High Court does not object to the reservation policy.”

The affidavit is not “just notes of the instrument, but a formal statement by the Deputy Secretary of the Ministry of Social Welfare, led by Sakina Itoo –JI He said. “It not only defended the reservation policy proposed by August 5, 2019, but also directly attacked the petitioners who challenged it. ”

Mr Parra said the affidavit argued that the 50% cap on bookings set by the Supreme Court of Homber “is not an inviolable rule and may be violated in exceptional circumstances”.

“This is directly related to the position of the BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party)-led coalition government. A careful study of the affidavit may reveal more surprises. Such sensitive matters need to be approved at multiple levels including political leadership and ministers, including the minister’s office. Common sense,” said the PDP leader.

“Not even mentioning the Cabinet Subcommittee [in the affidavit]. Has the government not taken its initiative seriously? Sajad Lone, chairman and legislator of the J&K Poesles Conference (JKPC), said that Sajad Lone, chairman and legislator of the J&K Poesles Conference (JKPC), attacked North Carolina where the ruling was ruled.