JK Rowling reveals how she was cheated by fraudster artists after she became super rich – she has revealed that she has donated £200 million to charity

JK Rowling revealed she had been “scammered several times” because it showed up that she had donated about £200 million to the charity.

While writing the sixth part of her world-famous Harry Potter Wizard series, the author encounters a picture of Vasek Knotek, a five-year-old younger Czech boy, with his face leaning against a barbed wire.

Since then, the enthusiastic 59-year-old has sent a letter to former fundraising director to save the children, Winterborn’s MEP Baroness Nicholson is eager to help vulnerable young people in the former Soviet state.

A year later in 2010, Rowling and Baroness Nicholson formed a charity called “The Senior Group of Children” which was later renamed Lumos, the charm of a book by Rowling, the shining light of the darkest era.

In the twenty years since the author first saw the image of a Czech orphanage, Harry Potter’s author has donated £63 million to charities in Eastern European countries to help children.

According to the Sunday Times, Rowling has donated nearly £200 million to three charities in total – Lumes, the Warrant Charitable Trust and Anne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic.

However, the author also shares how she was forced to do more “due diligence” to ensure her cash was conducted to those who needed it, as she revealed she was “certainly “scammered a few times.”

She re-plundered through countless letters begging for help, and she shares how the latter lost a lot of money in 2005 once she received letters from Lloyds investors.

According to the Sunday Times, Rowling donated nearly £200 million to three charities in total – Lumos, Volant Charitable Trust and Anne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic

When the author sees painful photos of Czech orphans, the author first has a passion for children in Eastern European countries (photo: Rowling and husband Neil Murray)

She told me that I never know how lucky I was, so I never know the pain of losing my wealth and asked me to give them money because they and their spouse could no longer afford opera. ” Sunday Times.

In addition, she was the last person to complain about her wealthy lifestyle, she explained that life was full of difficulties. When you get a lot of money, you never dream of living the life you want to deal with.

Reflecting on her difficult childhood in Chepstow, southeast Wales, and then living in poverty after leaving her brief marriage, where she travels to Edinburgh with her baby daughter Jessica, who Rowling shares that she sometimes gets hungry.

“I give priority to feeding my daughter, but that’s not the worst. This is a daily insult – the vast majority, can’t give your kids what you want. ” she said.

“I remember meeting another mom, whose son is the same age as my daughter. He has a lot of toys. I have a shoe box, which I live in with two toys from Jessica. Something that really attracts you.

Rowling’s charitable revelation comes shortly after her angry world war with Boy George, who accused her of loathing men in the Supreme Court’s ruling on the legal status of trans women.

Rowling, who also wrote under the name of Robert Galbraith’s male pen, said she could not tell the difference between a trans woman and a biological man, blowing up the cultural club singer.

The 63-year-old Popstar, along with other stars like Tilda Swinton and Pedro Pascal, recently branded Rowling’s “The Mandiend Loser” on Instagram.

This is in the Cultural Club singer Boy Goerge claims Rowling (Rowling)

The George Boy is responding to a tweet criticizing Pedro Pascal. Actors (above) have no doubts about supporting trans people (sold in the virus’s “protective doll” t-shirts to support trans rights)

The singer wrote that Pascal responded to a tweet showing that Pascal was a trans rights claim and a misogynist, writing: “Stop this nonsense, if you disagree with @jk_rowling, you hate women. She hates men. That’s where this truth lies.

“She can’t tell a difference between a “trans” woman and a biological male. Her imagination is weird?

But Rowling – now tweets what she calls “sex-based rights” almost every day, he uses emojis and retorts to say, “I don’t hate men.”

She wrote: “I married a man, George. I don’t hate men.”

“I just live in reality – but they are sure – commit 98% of sexual assaults, while 88% of the victims are women.

“There is also no less likely to pose a risk to women or girls across identifying men.”

She did not elaborate on how many of the people considered transgressive.

She then added: “Accusing me of hating men because I don’t think trans women should be allowed to enter all women-only spaces, and that would rather…you know very well that these are actually men.”

Rowling has been speaking out on trans subjects for several years. In 2018, a spokesperson explained that her “like trans women” “like middle-aged men” were “like middle-aged”.

The Supreme Court filed an appeal from the Scottish woman on April 17 (pictured above). The judge is eager to stress that the ruling should not be regarded as a “victory”

The Commission on Equality and Human Rights hastily updated its guidance on single-sex spaces, banning transgender people from their preferred toilets

Rowling has been referring to trans women as “men” after the Supreme Court’s decision on April 17.

The ruling concluded in an appeal filed by the Scottish Women’s Campaign that when interpreting the Equality Act, the legal definition of women is the legal definition of biological women.

This led to the overhaul of the single-sex space by the Commission on Equality and Human Rights, which means that even transgender people (GRCs) with gender-recognized certificates are still considered their biologically born gender.

Members of Congress pointed out that the judgment could lead to discrimination against those who are not traditionally male or female.