Mumbai: After Maharashtra’s political circles were once again caught in a possible party of Uddhav and Raj Thackeray, who showed later on Saturday that he was ready to bury the hatchet in Maharashtra’s interests. Uddhav responded to his estranged cousin, who was also ready to forget and forgive, provided that Raj supported him “unconditionally” and sweared to chhatrapati shivaji maharaj that he would not be willing to entertain Bharatiya Janata party in the future.
In an interview with film producer Mahesh Manjarekar, a filmmaker of the podcast released on Saturday, the head of Maharashtra Navnirman Sena said he was ready to tinker with Uddhav for the greater benefit of Maharashtra. He said he had worked with Uddhav at Shiv Sena and would not “work with him” in the future if the welfare in Maharashtra is necessary.
“Our disputes, differences are insignificant. Maharashtra is much bigger. I am ready to put myself aside. For the interests of Maharashtra. It’s not difficult to unite or work together. But it’s not a person, it’s a will (actually).
The head of MNS left Shiv Sena in 2005 because Uddhav was appointed “Executive President”. When leaving the party, he accused Uddhav and his lad of not letting him work. He said he could have separated the parties because many Shiv Sena lawmakers were ready to join him but decided to build a new party on their own.
Raj compared his exit with Eknath Shinde’s, saying, “Mr. Shinde’s politics is completely different from my decision (leaving Shiv Sena). Many legislators have come to me. It’s easy for me (split party). But when I leave Shiv Sena, I shouldn’t be in Balasaheb thackeray sena nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata nata in nata in nata nata. Uddhav.
Uddhav also announced that he was ready to join forces with his cousin, who is now his Bete Noire.
“There is no dispute between us. However, I publicly announce today that all our differences are over. Others.
Uddhav expressed doubts about Raj’s commitment, noting that the MNS chief has changed his position on BJP in many cases. “I am also ready to put our small differences aside. But I have a condition. If you oppose the BJP in the Lok Sabha election, when we say all businesses from Maharashtra are brought to Gujarat, the government will not be brought to Gujarat. Agree to future compromises.
Reactions from other leaders of both parties suggest that there is still a large trust deficit on both sides. From his party’s perspective, Shiv Sena (UBT) Sanjay Raut said Raj Thackeray was not for the interests of Maharashtra. “We’re going to wait for something better than that to happen,” he said.
On the other hand, MNS leader Amey Khopkar said: “I pray to God that such an evil alliance will not happen.”
Another MNS leader, Sandeep Deshpande, said Uddhav Thackeray had knocked down Raj twice before. “Raj Saheb and Uddhav spoke about the league in 2014. Decided to meet from Bala Nandgaokar on our side and Anil Desai from Shiv Sena to discuss further things. So the form of Raj Sahen withheld ab is MNS candidates. However, Mr uddav and Mr desai stopped our response in our response, they were still looking for jobs, they were still distributing their job seekers, they were always distributing their approvals. Betrayed us in 2017,” Mr Deshpande said.
When asked about Thackeray’s cousin hinting at the league, Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis said: “If they were together, we would be happy. But our media read too much. They are quotes for the league. They are just setting conditions. What can I say. What do I say?” Mr. Fadnavis said.
