Our knowledge of secret government agencies planning to darken the sun – experts warn of “unnecessary” consequences
Most people may not have heard of Aria – a secret British government agency that funded efforts to make the sun dark.
ARIA, or the “Agency Research and Invention Agency”, has allocated £57 million to the so-called “geoengineering” project, aiming to slow global warming.
One of these projects is the highlight of the ocean cloud, which involves spraying salt water into the sky to enhance the reflectivity of low-lying clouds.
Salt will force the droplets of water in the clouds to gather together or “fusion”, which will make them more reflective and stop so much sunlight from reaching the earth.
“In climate change, we are essentially competing over time, which is the consequence of the planet, potentially devastating change,” said ARIA CEO Ilan Gur.
But some experts warn that this outdoor experiment will begin within the next five years – which may have “unnecessary side effects.”
So you might be wondering – who the hell is the arias and where does their money come from?
Read on to learn more about the publicly funded agency, which pays only £4.1 million in salary per year for its employees.
Aria, the UK government’s research funder, aims to “release scientific and technological breakthroughs that benefit all”.
“We enable scientists and engineers to engage in research that is too speculative, too hard or too interdisciplinary to pursue elsewhere,” it said on its website.
The research institute was originally the creative idea of Dominic Cummings, former president of Boris Johnson, and was founded in 2021 by former Commerce Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng.
The agency is headquartered in London and has received a staggering £800 million budget (cash for taxpayers) to move towards “high risk, advanced rewards” scientific research.
As Aria said on its website, other research projects include programmable factories that can remove mobile carbon dioxide and smarter robotic mechanisms, thus “ease tomorrow’s labor challenges.”
CEO Ilan Gur earns about £450,000 a year. telegraph Report – triple the Prime Minister.
Meanwhile, Chief Financial Officer Antonia Jenkinson brought home about £215,000, and Chief Product Officer Pippy James had about £175,000.
Despite only 37 employees, ARIA has a total salary of £4.1 million per year, and the company’s top four employees make nearly £1 million in taxpayer cash each year.
Most people may not have heard of Aria – UK government agencies funding efforts to curb global warming.
Ocean clouds light up, involving ships that spray salt water into the sky to enhance the reflectivity of low-lying clouds. The picture shows Dymchurch Beach on the Kent Coast
When first established, Mr. Cummings put forward a vision for the research institute and told the House of Commons that Aria must have “extreme freedom” from the “terrible bureaucracy” in Whitehall.
A committee member, MP Katherine Fletcher, said the proposal lacks supervision to make aria Easy to capture by “Tinfoil Hat Brigade” Providing abnormal and potentially transformative research has never been successful.
Questions were also raised about their willingness to share information.
one ReportThe Office of the Information Commissioner (ICO) released in March this year, showing that ARIA has received a Freedom of Information (FOI) request to seek information about its “Scope Dividing Our Planet” project.
The request comes from the online communication “Democracy for Sale,” which requires information about those funded under the project, which is intended to support the program “fill gaps in the Earth’s system to ensure a confidence response to the climate crisis”.
Aria responded that it did not treat the requested information as “environmental information.”
After complaining to the ICO, the initial request was maintained and information was provided.
“The Commissioner agrees that the public is transparent about ARIA’s projects on funding,” the ICO’s report reads.
Experts hope that by reflecting some of the sunlight back into space, they can curb the effects of global warming. Pictured shows cyclists walking through Richmond Park at a spectacular sunrise in London
Works online Prospect MagazineBritish lawyer David Allen Green said Aria’s confidentiality shows that “an elite who wants public funds, but not public responsibility”.
He warned that there is a concept within the government: “Publicly funded projects should be closed by public scrutiny, and those with public powers are best understood and that this information should be kept private.”
“As a publicly funded institution, our responsibility to taxpayers is our top priority. So we need visible actual expenses,” Aria said on its website.
The Ocean Cloud Highlight is one of 21 so-called “geoengineering” projects, earning £57 million from ARIA, five of which will involve outdoor trials.
Another project that received funding was described as an early exploration of the potential of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI).
This will involve a study to study the age of milligrams of mineral dust in the stratosphere in air balloons.
Aria said that in this controlled experiment, none of these materials will be released into the atmosphere and all materials will be returned to restore and analyzed by scientists.
However, Some scientists fear expensive efforts could fail or even backfire, leading to destructive weather patterns and creating Climate change Worse.
In any case, the UK receives only 1,400 hours of sunshine per year on average – an average of only 3.8 hours a day. Image, a house in Dunsden, Oxfordshire on November 6
In any case, the UK receives only 1,400 hours of sunshine per year on average – an average of only 3.8 hours a day.
£57 million is the funding of a large number of taxpayers, and it will be spent on this speculative technology designed to manipulate the Earth’s climate. ” telegraph.
“Just because they “work” in the model, or on a microscopic scale in the lab or in the sky, it doesn’t mean they will cool the climate safely in the real world without unnecessary side effects.
Therefore, this study cannot prove that these technologies are safe, successful, or reversible.
“The British government is leading what academic analysts around the world call a “slip slope” to ultimately dangerous large-scale deployment of solar geoengineering technology.”
Meanwhile, Naomi Vaughan, a climate change professor at the University of East Anglia UEA, said the reflection method could pose “new risks” to society.
“Scientists are cautious about solar radiation management research because of how it can be used or abused in the future,” she said.
What are the side effects of geoengineering strategies?
Scientists have proposed various solutions to climate change, including many controversial geoengineering strategies.
These include:
afforestation: This technology will irrigate deserts, such as those in Australia and North Africa, to plant millions of trees that may absorb carbon dioxide.
Tax refund: This vegetation will also attract sunlight, and the desert currently reflects back to space, thus helping global warming.
Scientists have proposed various solutions to climate change. File photos
Artificial ocean rise: Engineers will use long pipes to pump nutrient-rich water to cool ocean surface waters.
Tax refund: If this process stops, it may cause the ocean to rebalance its heat levels and quickly change the climate.
Ocean alkalization: This involves piled up lime into the ocean to chemically increase the absorption of carbon dioxide.
Tax refund: Research shows that it is of little use in reducing global temperatures.
Sea iron fertilization: The method involves pouring iron into the ocean to improve the growth of photosynthetic organisms that can absorb carbon dioxide.
Tax refund: Research shows that it is of little use in reducing global temperatures.
Solar radiation management: By injecting the aerosol of reflective sulfate into the atmosphere, this will reduce the amount obtained by sunlight on the earth.
Tax refund: Carbon dioxide will still accumulate in the atmosphere.
