In Greens’ delusional plan, taking over Australia within 18 years – as well as Adam Bandt and “Albo’s nemesis”
Four years ago, a fresh Max Chandler-Mather spoke passionately about his 18-year government plan.
The former union organizer and Green Stove said his ambitious plot relies on a simple equation: You vote for every three meaningful conversations with Australian voters.
If he debates with desperate logic, Green Party volunteers have just had 1,866,216 meaningful conversations with Australian voters who could seize power in 2040.
His equation will make them a total of 45 seats, making them a senior party in the alliance with the Labor Party, with only 44.
But, in Mike Tyson’s words, everyone has a plan until they get punched – Mr. Chandler -Mather performed well on Saturday and was really out.
The 33-year-old lost his seat in Brisbane Griffith after 5.8 per cent of the swings of labor candidate Renee Coffey.
Similarly, Adam Bandt’s humiliating defeat in Melbourne sitting in Labour’s Sarah Witty will strike through the green when the party is forced to select new leaders.
While the count is ongoing – he may have replaced Mehreen Faruqi insisted he was “still a leader”, no one expected him to lead the way before Thursday morning’s labor rival Sarah Witty.
Four years ago, a freshly-faced Max Chandler-Mather talked passionately about his 18-year-old government plan’ (pictured)
But, in Mike Tyson’s words, everyone has a plan until they get slapped in the face – Mr. Chandler Moser got better and really gotten out of the way on Saturday
Although the Greens press release prematurely claimed on Saturday night that he “hoped the Earl to elect him in Melbourne” and their national vote fell from its 2022 high.
So, what is everything so wrong with the Greens leader and his sick party?
Seat redistribution
Although his critics (and many) hope it all depends on voters’ personal opposition to him, the main reason why Bandt Lost is lost is that it happened long before the vote.
Last year, the borders of Bandt’s Melbourne seat were redistributed.
Remapping the election map means that the Greens leader lost several suburbs in the inner north, where he was popular while also absorbing more areas of freedom support.
This greatly narrowed his chances of maintaining a seat since 2010.
However, Bant could not decide to reassign his seat.
Although his critics (and there are a lot) hope it all depends on voters’ personal opposition to him, the main reason why green leader Adam Bandt (pictured) is lost is that it happened a long time ago
The stopper, not the builder
The leaders of the Green Party shoulder the responsibility of positioning green, and are obviously against labor.
Renee Coffey, a labor challenger who evicts Max Chandler in Griffith, said voters are most concerned about life and housing.
But the Greens are seen as a barrier to the latter’s progress after joining forces with liberals to block some of Labor’s housing reforms, especially its $10 billion Housing Australia Future Fund.
Mr. Chandler-Mather kept locking the corner with the Prime Minister on very public issues to achieve Labor’s housing policy, thus earning the name “Albo’s nemesis” in this publication.
Griffith is fundamentally a progressive voter and people want to see real changes and progress, so I think I’m disappointed with some of the obstacles and the idea of this protest. ”
Mr Chandler-Mather kept locking the corner with the Prime Minister very publicly on Labor’s housing policy, earning the title “Albo’s Nemesis” in this publication (Photo: The two exchanged heated words in 2023)
Radical movement, not parties
Kos Samaras, a former Victorian labor strategist and director of the Redbridge Group, said the Greens became a “movement that fueled civil unrest and vandalism.”
He added: “The party has achieved a series of bad results in state, territorial and local government elections, which is clearly aware of this.”
“When they adjust the process, the damage has been caused. Their leader is now gone.
“I never thought I would see the greens lose Melbourne in their lifetime.”
Queensland Green Party founder Drew Hutton responded to these concerns, claiming that the choice of green plant hands is often counterproductive.
“I think Max (Chandler Moser) has a little problem at the CFMEU rally,” Hutton told ABC.
At the rally, Chandler-Mather attended the meeting, and protesters held the placard of the prime minister, depicted as Adolf Hitler’s “Albonazi” and “The Traitor”, written on it (pictured)
“CFMEU is not the kind of combination that wants to be associated with it.”
In August last year, the Albany government was placed in a controversial coalition amid its allegations of corruption and violence.
At the rally, Chandler-Mather attended the meeting, with protesters holding the Prime Minister’s placard, depicted as Adolf Hitler’s “Albonazi” and “The Wordor”.
Hutton added: “Many people think the Greens are too radical and represent too many radical youth votes.”
This is the point made by Mr. Albanes, who fought back against Mr. Chandler Messer’s claim, who was bullied in Parliament on Wednesday night.
“This is a man who signed at the CFMEU rally in Brisbane and describes me as the Nazi,” the Prime Minister said.
Anti-Semitism accusations
The party’s position on Israel, which they often accused the Labor government of “complicity with genocide”, angered many Jewish Australians.
Julian Leeser, a Jewish liberalist in Berowra, north of North Sydney, shared a statement on Facebook on Wednesday, where he accused the Greens of anti-Semitism.
He said the Greens’ seats in the House were a rejection of the Greens’ anti-Semitism and was also a decision by Peter Dutton to place them. ”
Meanwhile, Foreign Secretary Penny Wong sent a similar analysis of Samaras, telling Channel 9: “Australians reject conflict politics and appeal politics.”
Senator Wang added: “Unfortunately, Adam Bandt is like Peter Dutton in some ways.”
She is not wrong considering that Bandt has suffered from the ignorance of losing her seat as well.
Mr. Bandt rarely misses the media’s chances to pose with his big red toothbrush to highlight the party’s bid to add teeth to Medicare – some believe the party’s core message of concerns about the environment is too far away
The troubles of the Liberal Party
Senator Faroch, the current Green Party deputy leader and leader, took over the Minor Party, blamed the party’s election on fear of Peter Dutton.
“It’s clear that many progressive Australians in this election are very anxious about the Dutton administration, and I think that’s a factor,” she told ABC on Thursday morning.
She claimed voters were “feared” by the “divisive, hatred-filled Peter Dutton administration.”
“It’s obvious that Labor and Liberals will always work together to prevent the greens,” she added.
This analysis will be a little hollow when the Greens make it clear that the campaign will “eliminate Dutton.”
Meanwhile, experienced Senator Sarah Hanson-Young blamed the party for his poor performance in the House of Commons amid the Liberal collapse.
She told ABC that liberal voters tend to work, which is a huge drop in liberal votes that liberals vote directly. ”
“And it’s hard for our candidates to overcome the boundaries”
Senator Mehreen Faruqi (pictured), the current deputy leader and leader of the Green Party, takes over the party, blames their election on fear of Peter Dutton
Lost core information
Mr Hutton helped Bob Brown find the Australian Greens, who he said was deviating from their original purpose.
They position themselves as a party for housing reform and renters, rather than a party that focuses primarily on the environment.
Indeed, leader Mr. Bandert rarely misses the media opportunity to place his big red toothbrush to highlight the party’s bid to add teeth to Medicare.
When asked to list his top priorities, climate change lags behind the fifth place in solving the rental crisis, dentistry, universal parenting and ending local logging.
He told ABC that the Greens have always been social justice and democracy. ”
“While this is a problem at the expense of the environment, there is one problem.
“I’ve been talking to some older vegetables…they expressed to me the loss caused by the concern about the environment, which is really why we built the green in the first place.”
Claudia Long of ABC echoed this, saying the Greens lost the “Tree Conservative Party” – wealthy elderly people who are economically conservative but socially progressive, with an environmental concern.
Instead, these voters are more likely to vote for the turquoise independents who are more likely to represent their own interests.
The Greens are often seen as a barrier to progress after joining forces with liberals to block some of Labor’s housing reforms, especially its $10 billion housing future fund.
The next step for vegetables
The greens may fall, but they don’t come out.
As Peter Van Onselen, political editor of the Daily Mail, said, they have actually increased the power of the Senate.
“Yes, don’t be fooled by its poor performance in the House of Commons where its leader Adam Bandt lost its seat,” he wrote.
“The Greens will stick with all the Senate, given that Labor has increased the number of people in the Senate – and once again sent more people to the left – they will soon take control of the Senate.”
“Yes, the Greens themselves will have the balance of power in the Senate. They will have the ability to decide what the labour proposes, what is the law, what is amended according to their desires-what is rejected will never take effect. ”
Read his full analysis here.
