Taylor Swift Subpoena responds: Blake Lively vs Justin Baldoni Legal Hate: Taylor Swift’s spokesman responds to subpoena, and that’s what she says
Swift’s limited role clarifies
In a statement issued Friday, a Swift spokesman clarified that her participation was strictly limited to the permission of her song My tears Ricochet For the soundtrack.
The spokesperson stressed that Swift “never introduces” and “has not been involved in the casting, direction or post-production of the project”, as stated in the ABC News report.
“Taylor Swift never saw an editor, did not make creative input, and did not watch the film until a few weeks after its release,” the spokesman said.
The pop star reportedly travels around the world throughout the production window.
Allegations of using Swift’s name
The reaction of Swift’s team also strongly criticized the motivation behind the subpoena, describing it as “generating tabloid clickbait” rather than pursuing meaningful legal discoveries. “Given the songs that 19 other artists also licensed for the film, Subpoena Taylor Swift’s decision was decided, not based on her name, not on the need for fact.”
Lively camp condemns tactics
A spokesman for Blake Lively responded to similar views, condemning what they called a “circus-like approach” to serious legal problems.
Swift is a “global voice” that is used to draw attention to legal cases that are focused on justice, the spokesman said.
“This is not a Barnum & Bailey’s circus,” Lively’s camp asserted. “The ongoing public campaign by defendants, including Ms. Swift, aims to intimidate and humiliate women to speak out.”
The spokesman further condemned the defendants’ broader legal strategy, accusing them of seeking to undermine California victims’ rights laws and oppose the broader #MeToo movement.
Background of legal disputes
The legal dispute dates back to December 2024, when Lively filed a formal complaint with the California Department of Civil Rights alleging that Baldoni was sexually harassed while filming It ends with usHe has also guided him.
Baldoni, represented by attorney Bryan Freedman, denied the allegations, calling them “false and reputational motivation.”
His counter-claim included the claim that Lively tried to unduely influence the production of the film by leveraging relationships with prominent figures such as Taylor Swift and her husband, actor Ryan Reynolds, as stated in ABC News.
Court litigation
The case is scheduled to be heard in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on March 9, 2026, presided over by Judge Lewis Leman.
In the trial leadership, Lively filed a revised complaint, while both she and Renault filed a motion to dismiss a counterclaim filed against them.
The legal teams of parties, including Baldoni and Live’s attorneys, have not responded to inquiries after Swift’s official statement.
FAQ
What is Blake Lively’s complaint against Justin Baldoni?
Lively initially filed a complaint with the California Civil Rights Department in December, accusing Baldoni of sexual harassment and retaliation, a move that was about a week later.
Is Taylor Swift alienated from Blake Lively?
Taylor Swift reportedly retreated from his long-term friendship with Blake Lively in an ongoing legal dispute involving Justin Baldoni.
