Justin Baldoni’s camp is challenging the authenticity of the crucial subpoena. If they are right, it could completely subvert the lawsuit.
Due to this significant timeline flaw, the legal struggle can take a surprising turn. According to reports, the chronology of the incident could undermine key evidence in Lively’s lawsuit, driving the dispute and sparking new legal and media wars.
Can this twist flip the case?
Stephanie Jones, a former public relations representative for Bardoni, reportedly received the document and was told to send a vivid private text message, which she did.
However, because the document was allegedly distributed before any legal action was taken by either party, his attorney has now questioned its validity. Bryan Freedman, Bardoni’s attorney, asserted that Jones had retweeted the information “out of malicious intention.”
According to Freedman’s statement to the Daily Mail, “No doubt Stephanie Jones intentionally and maliciously spread private and confidential communications about her former clients in order to humiliate them and destroy the fledgling business and reputation of her former employees.”
Her actions were merely motivated by maliciousness, and took place before any phantom subpoena we have not yet witnessed.
Also Read: Big Exposure: Blake Lively accused of using Justin Baldoni
Freedman claims that no case was filed against Jones or anyone before sending these texts to Blake, and that the subpoena requires the case number mentioned in the filing of the legal case, as stated in the Daily Mail report.
Is the subpoena even real?
Jones’ attorney Maaren Shah retaliated, saying there is still no defense for what the whole world saw in the text. Bardoni or his attorney should sign an affidavit that shows that they believe the subpoena legally requires Ms. Jones to provide abhorrent evidence to show that his client plans to smear campaign against Ms. Lively is fraudulent.
Justin Baldoni is represented by Jones’s company Jonesworks PR, but once the dispute begins, the two end their fierce relationship.
Advisor Melissa Nathan and former employee Jennifer Abel then took over the position.
According to recent court documents, Jones claimed that when she posted private messages to Lively, it became the basis for the actress’ famous lawsuit against her co-star in December, she was followed by the subpoena.
However, Freedman pointed out the differences in the timeline, noting that he did not see the document, which raised questions about whether or not it had ever been raised. Bryan Freedman said the document was allegedly October 1, 2024, before any official proposal actually filed. This is important because, according to the Daily Mail report, a real subpoena usually requires a case number of a legal case from a statutory case to be enforced legally.
It was signed by Lively’s attorney and her husband, actor Ryan Reynolds, who practiced at Manatt, New York, Phelps & Phillips.
Accordingly, all letters and documents related to the vividness of Jones and his business must be handed over by Jones.
The New York Times December article highlighted the text, found on a cell phone released by Abel’s work. Attorney and legal expert Oleg Nekritin said that prior discoveries are possible, but only in certain circumstances, such as protection of evidence that may be lost or destroyed.
In the Baldoni case, any concerns about pre-trial summons would be meaningless, as the complaint was eventually filed, which gave both parties the opportunity to summon witnesses and collect documents.
So if Baldoni’s team is correct and there is no valid case when sending the subpoena, then the wrench may be placed in Lively’s case.
At present, this “timeline distortion” has introduced an already controversial legal struggle, introducing a whole new level of complexity and controversy.
FAQ
Why is the subpoena questioned?
According to Justin Baldoni’s lawyer, the subpoena was issued before there was a legal case, potentially invalidating it and questioning how the text was obtained.
What role does public relations companies play in this situation?
Justin Baldoni’s former PR officer was accused of handing over private texts out of malicious intentions, but her legal team claimed she complied with the legal order and exposed the smear campaign.
