Hyderabad: The Telangana High Court upheld the request of the state government to reject 14 engineering colleges in the Kandlakoya area of ​​Medchal Malkajgiri district to increase seats in the 2024-25 BTECH (Computer Science Engineering) course.
Justice K. Lakshman of the Telangana High Court believes that data provided by the state government shows that there are about 674 CSE seats in the 41 engineering colleges located in the Medchal Malkajgiri district 2024-25, with 141 seats in 14 colleges near Kandlakoya.
The judge maintained the government’s decision through data and taking into account other facts such as infrastructure, teaching and non-teaching staff.
The court dismissed the debate at these universities, believing that the government discriminated against them because some members of these institutions and society had links to the former BRS government or to the former ruling party.
Petitioners include Anurag Group, Malla Reddy Group, MGR Education Association, CMR Group, Vidya Jyoti College of Engineering, MLR Technology Institute, Marri Laxman Reddy College of Engineering, Aeronautical Engineering, Maruthi Education Society, Maruthi Education Society, St Martin Martin Education Society, St Martin College of Engineering, School of Engineering and Nalla Malla Malla Malla Malla Malla Malla Malla Reddy Insergection and Engineering and Narla Malla Malla Reddy and Technology and Nalla Malla Malla Malla Reddy Insergection and Engineering and Narla Malla Malla Reddy and Technology and Nalla Malla Malla College and
Some universities claim that the state government has deliberately denied its rights, which have been granted to other institutions. Such actions are arbitrary and illegal and will fall within the scope of legal malicious intentions. The court pointed out that when there is no specific claim to prove discrimination, it cannot be said that the government’s actions are unreasonable.
The college also argued that the state government failed to take into account that AICTE and JNTU had granted their license by granting an unspecified certificate after conducting the inspection.
Justice Lackshman pointed out AICTE’s notes, which inspected 14 universities in a day. The judge noted: “AICTE’s Expert Visits Committee (EVC) must conduct the inspection correctly. It must take into account the detailed scope of the infrastructure provided by the Petitioner Engineering College, including teaching staff and non-teaching staff, libraries, computers, computers, computers, computers, computers, computers, and other infrastructure. It cannot verify the verification of the degree in detail.
In rejecting the requirements of the engineering college, the judge also considered data submitted by JNTU, which stated that only 48 students wrote the exams from the 14 engineering colleges, of which 376 were assigned to the colleges, and only 60 students participated in the courses.
