At that time, Prince Harry bumped into the wrong door and when he visited a friend in London in the UK, he said he needed extra police protection.

At a clumsy moment, Prince Harry knocked on the wrong door while searching for a friend’s London house.

California-based Royal landed in the UK last month to challenge the UK government’s decision to downgrade its taxpayer-funded level of armed security.

During his stay in the UK of Duke of Sussex, he visited a friend.

But according to a family, Prince Harry knocked on the wrong door three times before finding his friend’s house.

The buttons captured by the ring doorbell show the prince talking on the phone while standing at the door.

One resident said that their housekeeper had answered Harry’s door but did not recognize him, Reported by the Sun.

“We were shocked to see that it was him on the camera.

“We only really notice once the neighbors start talking,” they said.

California-based Royal landed in the UK last month to challenge the UK government’s decision to downgrade its taxpayer-funded armed security levels

The prince believes that since Megxit five years ago, he has been “picked out” and “continuously inferior treatment”.

Neighbors were confused among royal witnesses, and many found it strange that the prince didn’t know where he was going.

“I don’t think many people will walk along a crash road, let alone if you’re not safe,” said one neighbor.

Prince Harry’s misfortune was revealed on Sunday that he stayed at a friend’s house during his visit to the UK and sent it to the front door.

Harry lost his appeal last week and was told that the security of his “complaint” over-degraded “is not translated into legal arguments” to successfully challenge the decision.

The prince believes that since five years ago, he has been “picked out” and “obtained badly inferior treatment”.

His barrister argued that when he was in England, he removed the royal life “at threat”.

The Royal had been dismissed his High Court lawsuit against the Ministry of the Interior because of the Executive Committee’s decision to protect the Royal Family and the Public Person (RAVEC), he should receive varying degrees of protection when he was in the country.

But, Rolls-Royce master Sir Jeffrey Voss said in a London ruling last week that Ravik’s decision was “considered as understandable, perhaps predictable, as a reaction to the claimant’s retreat from royal duties and leaving Britain to live abroad”.

“These are powerful and moving arguments, and the Duke of Sussex treats the system badly,” he said.

“But I concluded, and studied the details, I can’t say that the Duke’s sense of complaint translated into legal arguments to challenge Ravik’s decision.”

Sir Jeffrey said Harry “made the mistake of confusing superficial analogs” when comparing himself to other VIPs that had nothing to do with legal issues.

He added: “My conclusion is that the Duke of Sussex’s appeal will be dismissed”.

This means that at present, armed police bodyguards paid by British taxpayers will not automatically recover for him, Megan, Archie and Lilibet.

This raises more questions about whether the Sussex people will visit the UK again.

The King and his young son are believed to have different opinions about Harry’s decision to engage in a legal battle with the Ministry of the Interior. The Home Secretary called on the Duke to pay all the fees for both sides – the bill is close to £1.5 million.