Margo fans swallow bitter medicine: Magazine fans swallow bitter medicine: Federal employee regrets being fired by Governor and votes for Donald Trump
As the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cuts federal efforts, many magazine supporters are experiencing consequences firsthand. Now some are questioning their support for Trump.
Despite voting for Donald Trump, she now regrets her decision as thousands of government employees, many of them MAGA supporters, have been fired.
Why are government employees fired?
After Doge cuts, her position in the Treasury Department of Treasury was regretted by the Trump administration’s release from the Treasury Department of Treasury positions, according to a Newsweek report.
Please read also: Next week is coming: The U.S. could face a pandemic-like shortage of toilet paper and price increases; this is the main reason
Elon Musk is a close ally and major campaign donor who was appointed by President Donald Trump as the Department of Administration Efficiency (DOGE) after Donald Trump returned to the White House successfully. In addition to laying off thousands of federal employees, some of whom are still on a one-year probation period, Doge immediately took steps to reduce government spending.
Are Donald Trump’s voters also unemployed?
But, according to many reports, many of the fired people are Trump supporters, which could hurt Republicans’ opportunities in the 2026 midterm elections and again in 2028.
Things you should know:
Jennifer Piggott told CNN that even though she received a “highest rating” in her latest comment on January 31, she was one of the probation agencies of 125 fiscal service employees who were fired in February for allegedly underperforming.
When asked if this is the case, Piggott replied, “Yes, I do regret voting for Trump.” “For me, it doesn’t make sense to reduce the knees of working-class Americans. I have higher expectations for President Donald Trump,” cited in a Newsweek report.
Piggott told CNN that she has been threatened by death since she spoke out publicly and has given her home eggs. She also showed CNN the Trump campaign flag she unloaded from outside her home after the fire opened.
After being fired, another former FSA employee wanted to remain anonymous and refused to reveal her identity out of concerns about security, saying she is still reconsidering her decision to vote for Trump.
Will the Supreme Court participate?
U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup issued a preliminary injunction on March 14, requiring the Trump administration to rehire more than 17,000 suspended employees who have been terminated. Although the case can still be appealed to the Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Circuit decided not to stop Alsup’s ruling.
After being fired, Jennifer Piggott, a former employee of the Finance Service, expressed shock and embarrassment. She also said she wasn’t sure she would still be back to Trump if she knew what would happen.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt defended Magistrate Alsup, who argued that it was unconstitutional to take over the executive’s right to hire and fire.
The Supreme Court can now hear cases regarding the Trump administration’s authority to fire thousands of probation employees. Despite a 6-3 conservative majority, the High Court has decided to oppose the government, involving its authorization to freeze billions of dollars in foreign aid spending and dismiss heads of regulators.
FAQ
Why are Donald Trump’s voters unemployed?
The Department of Administration Efficiency (DOGE) has canceled thousands of federal positions, including many of them in Trump supporters. Despite the positive performance review, some employees were fired as part of a bigger effort to cut government spending.
Will the fired employees get their jobs back?
The judge ruled that 17,000 employees must be rehired, but the Trump administration is challenging the decision. The case can now continue to the Supreme Court.
Disclaimer: This content is written by a third party. The views expressed here are the views of the respective authors/entities and do not represent the views of the Economic Times (ET). ET does not warrant, warrant, or endorse any of its contents, nor is it responsible for them in any way. Please take all necessary steps to make sure that any information and content provided is correct, updated and verified. ET hereby disclaims any warranties, express or implied, relating to the Report and any Content.
