Elon Musk Doge: Is Elon Musk planning to use AI to manage the U.S. government? What you need to know
Ethics (Doge) led by Elon Musk has fired thousands of federal employees and asked the rest to list their weekly achievements by email. These emails are being scanned using AI, which is helping Doge decide whether employees should be retained.
Meanwhile, Doge has launched its own AI chatbot, which is helping federal employees perform daily tasks such as writing emails, summarizing drafts, etc. On the other hand, the State Department wants to use AI to track and monitor social media accounts of foreign nationals in the United States to show support for Hamas and other terrorist groups.
Please read also: Sunita Williams’ return: Hug, NASA’s stuck astronaut’s handshake in space’s newly replaced. watch
How does Elon Musk use AI?
According to the report, Elon Musk relies on artificial intelligence to process reactions and help determine who should continue to hire. It is reported that part of the plan is also to replace many government workers with AI systems. The structure and function of these AI systems is not yet clear, a concern that the Democrats in the U.S. Congress are pushing for a resolution. However, experts warn that deploying AI in the federal government could have serious consequences without thorough testing and verification.
“To use AI tools responsibly, designs with specific purposes need to be considered. They need to be tested and validated. Cary Coglianes, a professor of law and political science at the University of Pennsylvania, told Al Jazeeracoglianese that he would be “very suspicious” if AI is used to decide who should terminate who from work, which is not clear. He said there is a lot of potential for making mistakes, which makes AI biased and other potential problems.Please read also: “It’s not to make fun of your wife…”: JD Vance’s comments on USHA face the face of netizens
“It’s a very bad idea. We don’t know anything about how AI will make such a decision [including how it was trained and the underlying algorithms]such decisions will be based on the data, or why we should believe it is trustworthy. “Shobita Parthasarathy, a professor of public policy at the University of Michigan.
These concerns don’t seem to stop the current administration, especially Musk, who is a billionaire entrepreneur and close adviser to U.S. President Donald Trump.
For example, the U.S. State Department plans to deploy AI to analyze social media activities of foreign nationals, aiming to identify and possibly revoke visas for individuals suspected of supporting Hamas. However, the U.S. government has not yet provided transparency on the functioning of these systems.
Unexpected consequences of AI
Despite Musk’s ambitions, experts warn that implementing AI in government actions is full of potential pitfalls. A major problem is the lack of transparency in AI systems, especially about the training of these tools and the way decisions are made. Without clear understanding and supervision, AI-driven processes can lead to unexpected consequences, including bias and potentially unaffected by organizational errors. Bruce Schneier, a well-known computer scientist, criticized Musk’s plan as “technological fascism for chatbots”, highlighting the danger of over-reliance on AI without proper security.
Please read also: Sunita Williams’ long-awaited homecoming: NASA astronauts’ careers in space exploration, milestones and awards
Another problem is the potential erosion of accountability. Human officials are bound by supervision and can be held accountable for their actions, while AI systems lack the ability to judge morally and cannot be held accountable in the same way. This shift could undermine public trust in government agencies. In addition, the massive layoffs associated with Musk’s efficiency drivers have raised concerns about “bloody” in federal agencies, which could lead to the loss of institutional knowledge and the expertise that is critical to effective governance.
Impact on federal agencies
The implementation of AI and the accompanying workforce reduction have affected several federal agencies. For example, the Ministry of Education has begun layoffs, affecting nearly half of its workforce, with a total of about 1,300 employees. The move is part of the “final mission” under the department’s current government directive. Such significant cuts have sparked debate on the ability of governments to maintain basic services and perform their duties to the public.
Please read also: Barron Trump’s key advice helps us president during the Atlanta presidential debate. Check details
Public and political responses
Musk’s proposal sparked a mixed reaction between public and politicians. Supporters believe that AI integration is a necessary step to modernize government operations and curb excessive spending. They believe that embracing advanced technology can lead to more effective and responsive governments. Instead, critics argue that pushing a fast AI-driven process, coupled with substantive work, could undermine public service stability and erode democratic responsibility. They stressed the need for a balanced approach that incorporates technological advances while retaining basic human supervision and expertise.
